Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBarry, Peter J.
dc.contributor.advisorPenson, John B.
dc.creatorPaulson, Seth Lewis
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T22:17:10Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T22:17:10Z
dc.date.issued1979
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-725636
dc.descriptionVita.en
dc.description.abstractAvailability of credit to the farm sector through commercial banks has been a topic of concern for more than a decade. This study examines an operating policy for commercial banks which would tend to increase availability of funds to farm borrowers. Liability management through purchased funds intermediation provides a means to access regional and national sources of funds through Fed funds purchases, Certificates of Deposits, and money market certificates. Using a floating-rate loan policy on loans funded through liability management issues, a bank limits its risk exposure and can provide greater funds availability for lending at a given risk level. Liquidity risk theory is applied to a portfolio revision model of a commercial bank. Covariance estimates are incorporated in a quadratic programming model of portfolio revision. Risk return frontiers are estimated assuming a fixed-rate loan policy with purchased funds. The difference in risk between the two operating policies allows computation of a risk premium associated with the liquidity risk of liability management with purchased funds. A floating-rate loan policy means the liquidity risk of purchased funds is carried by the borrower. Since the liquidity risk is transferred from the bank to the borrower, an expected reduction in the lending rate is possible which is consistent with the liquidity risk premium. A reduction in loan rates is dependent on the competitiveness of the banking market. A purely competitive market will likely force the initial offer of the floating-rate down by the amount of the liquidity risk premium, while a monopolistic market may keep from reducing the rate by the full amount of the risk premium. Implications of the results on bank management, funds availability to farmers, usury laws, and further research are discussed.en
dc.format.extentx, 142 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectAgricultural crediten
dc.subjectBank loansen
dc.subjectMajor agricultural economicsen
dc.subject.classification1979 Dissertation P332
dc.subject.lcshAgricultural crediten
dc.subject.lcshUnited Statesen
dc.subject.lcshBank managementen
dc.subject.lcshMathematical modelsen
dc.subject.lcshBank loansen
dc.subject.lcshUnited Statesen
dc.titleLiability management and floating-rate loan pricing as risk responses by commercial banks in providing agricultural crediten
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc6391539


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access