Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSwank, Wendell G.
dc.creatorHopkins, Curtis Ray
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T22:24:38Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T22:24:38Z
dc.date.issued1981
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-648491
dc.descriptionTypescript (photocopy).en
dc.description.abstractRestocked Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) were studied on 2 different areas in East Texas from February 1979 through May 1980. The major emphasis was to provide information on movement, reproduction, and mortality as it relates to a turkey restocking effort. Habitat use of turkeys was also studied. Sixty-five turkeys were monitored using radio telemetry. The restocked turkeys generally centered their activity within 3 km of the release site. A few birds traveled distances exceeding 5 km from the release site, but the majority returned to the vicinity of the release site. The mean maximum dispersal from release was 4.4 km. Hens had the greatest mean maximum dispersal. It required approximately 7 months before turkeys obtained their maximum dispersal from release. Over study areas, the mean population dispersal area for 90% of the birds was 8,328 ha. Habitat and a resident population may have had a slight influence on the population dispersal area. The documented mortality for 16 months was 28%. Most of the mortality occurred during the first 6 months after release. There were no major differences in incubation attempts between resident and newly stocked birds, but resident birds were about 3 times more successful in raising poults than those recently stocked. Extended hen movement following a successful nesting may have been part of the cause for the low poult production during the first season. The peak egg-laying period was in early April. Pine hardwood and openings appeared to be preferred over the pine types by the birds on Brushy Creek study area. Within 2 weeks after stands were prescribed burned, turkeys indicated a preference for the new burns. More than 40% of all fixes were in burned stands approximately 6 weeks after the burn. The immediate effects of selective harvesting pine stands did not appear detrimental to turkeys.en
dc.format.extentxv, 117 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectWildlife and Fisheries Sciencesen
dc.subject.classification1981 Dissertation H793
dc.subject.lcshWild turkeyen
dc.subject.lcshWildlife habitat improvementen
dc.titleDispersal, reproduction, mortality and habitat utilization of restocked Eastern turkeys in East Texasen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinePhilosophyen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. D. in Philosophyen
thesis.degree.levelDoctorialen
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc8087999


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access