NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
A study of the administrative tasks and functions of the director of biomedical communications as perceived by the director and his administrative superior
dc.contributor.advisor | Stalcup, Robert J. | |
dc.creator | Hall, Richard Stephen | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-21T22:03:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-21T22:03:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1981 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-646856 | |
dc.description | Typescript (photocopy). | en |
dc.description.abstract | The purposes of this study were threefold: (1)to verify and clarify a set of administrative tasks and functions common to directors of biomedical communications, (2)to compare the perceptions of the directors and their administrative superiors regarding the relative frequency that these tasks are performed by directors of biomedical communications relative to a given set of administrative functions, and 3) determine if the administrative tasks and functions verified are congruent with those which have been identified in comparable studies. To pursue this study, an existing survey instrument was modified, validated by a five member jury of experts, and sent to the membership of the Association of Biomedical Communications Directors and their administrative superiors. The instrument contained a matrix of 24 administrative tasks and five administrative functions. The directors of biomedical communications were asked to rate how frequently they do perform, and how frequently they should perform, the task while engaged in each of the five functions. The administrative superiors were asked to rate how frequently the directors of biomedical communications should perform the tasks relative to the five functions. The effective response rate was 55 percent for the directors and 47 percent for their administrative superiors. ... | en |
dc.format.extent | xiii, 154 leaves | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.rights | This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use. | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
dc.subject | Educational Administration | en |
dc.subject.classification | 1981 Dissertation H178 | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Health services administration | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Medicine | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Information services | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Administration | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Medicine | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Management | en |
dc.title | A study of the administrative tasks and functions of the director of biomedical communications as perceived by the director and his administrative superior | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | Philosophy | en |
thesis.degree.grantor | Texas A&M University | en |
thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
thesis.degree.name | Ph. D. in Philosophy | en |
thesis.degree.level | Doctorial | en |
dc.type.genre | dissertations | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | reformatted digital | en |
dc.publisher.digital | Texas A&M University. Libraries | |
dc.identifier.oclc | 8010019 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.