Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorFarris, Donald E.
dc.contributor.advisorWohlgenant, Michael K.
dc.creatorMullen, John Denis
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T21:57:00Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T21:57:00Z
dc.date.issued1985
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-597601
dc.descriptionTypescript (photocopy).en
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study has been to examine the impact of changes in beef processing costs on US beef producers and consumers under market conditions representative of the 1980's. Competitive equilibrium in the beef sub-sector was modelled as a series of log linear differential supply and demand equations for two inputs, cattle and marketing inputs, and two products, retail beef and byproducts. Particular attention has been paid to estimating the elasticity of substitution between inputs and to examining its role in the distribution of total economic surplus gains. If the beef sub-sector switched from boxed beef technology to tray-ready beef, the supply of marketing inputs is estimated to decline by five percent, resulting in an annual surplus gain of $836.7 million which is almost two percent of the value of the products of the sub-sector. Modelling the switch in technologies as an input supply shift was found to be equivalent to modelling it as biased technical change. The relationship between the elasticities of demand, input supply and input substitution are crucial to the distribution of total surplus gains. The share of cattle producers of total gains fell from 71 percent to 55 percent as the elasticity of substitution increased from zero to 0.1. The large share to producers is explained by a supply of cattle that is inelastic relative to demand in the short run. As the supply of cattle became more elastic in supply, the share of producers soon fell below 50 percent and was less than 10 percent in the long run. The supply of marketing inputs was assumed to be highly elastic which meant that the suppliers of these inputs received little of the increase in surplus. An important implication of the study is that once input substitution is allowed, the share of the market participants in the gains from increased efficiency in the sub-sector depend not only on relative demand and supply elasticities but also on whether the efficiecy gains occur at the farm or processing level.en
dc.format.extentix, 119 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectMajor agricultural economicsen
dc.subject.classification1985 Dissertation M958
dc.subject.lcshBeefen
dc.subject.lcshMarketingen
dc.subject.lcshMathematical modelsen
dc.subject.lcshUnited Statesen
dc.subject.lcshBeef cattleen
dc.subject.lcshPricesen
dc.subject.lcshMathematical modelsen
dc.subject.lcshUnited Statesen
dc.titleThe impact on consumers and cattle producers of changes in beef processing costsen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. Den
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCross, H. Russel
dc.contributor.committeeMemberShumway, C. Richard
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc16531661


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access