Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorFahlquist, Davis
dc.creatorButler, Dwain K.
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T21:51:07Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T21:51:07Z
dc.date.issued1983
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-543614
dc.descriptionTypescript (photocopy).en
dc.description.abstractThe theory, measurement, and application of gravity gradients is explored. Exphasis is on (a) the development of analytical and interpretive techniques using gravity-gradient data, and (b) the development of practical field microgravimetric techniques for gravity-gradient measurement or determination. Three field test cases evaluate the techniques and assess their practicality. The analytical and interpretive techniques are also applied to data from a published high-resolution gravity survey. Four key questions, posed in the first chapter, are addressed: (a) Do the measured gradients exhibit greater resolving power and improved detectability thresholds than gravity? The resolution advantage of gravity gradients is shown to hold regardless of depth of the anomalous structure, while the detection advantage of gravity gradients over gravity is limited to structures < 10 to 15 m depth. (b) Do relations which exist theoretically between vertical and horizontal gradients exist between measured gradients? For the cases examined in this paper, namely (1) the case where both vertical and horizontal gradients are measured, and (2) the case where the horizontal gradient is measured and the vertical gradient is obtained as its Hilbert transform, all of the theoretical relations between gradients can be recognized between the measured gradients. (c) How does discrete sampling along a profile line affect the ability to recognize diagnostic features in the gradient profiles and other representations of the data? Two primary effects are identified: (1) filtering effects, and (2) amplitude attenuation and spatial spectra broadening. (d) Is it preferable to measure the horizontal gradient profile and calculate the vertical gradient profile from it as suggested by some authors, is the reverse procedure preferable, or must both gradients be measured for the methods to be usable? On the basis of the present work, the preferable procedure is to measure horizontal gradient profiles and then compute vertical gradient profiles using the Hilbert transform; reasons presented for this conclusion differ from those of other authors.en
dc.format.extentxvi, 257 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectGeophyicsen
dc.subject.classification1983 Dissertation B985
dc.subject.lcshGravityen
dc.subject.lcshMeasurementen
dc.subject.lcshGravimeters (Geophysical instruments)en
dc.titleMicrogravimetry and the theory, measurement and application of gravity gradientsen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinePhilosophyen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. D. in Philosophyen
thesis.degree.levelDoctorialen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCarlson, Richard L.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHoskins, Earl R.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberJohnson, Brann
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSpencer, Terry
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc11118642


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access