NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
A comparison of methods of characterizing recreationists and recreation behavior
dc.contributor.advisor | Reid, Leslie M. | |
dc.creator | Stribling, James Clayton | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-21T21:48:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-21T21:48:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1976 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-475518 | |
dc.description | Vita. | en |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this study was to compare the predictive capabilities of two methods of characterizing the outdoor recreationalist and two methods of characterizing outdoor recreation. Hypotheses were developed and tested comparing the number of statistically significant associations between (1) characterization of the recreationist as an individual recreation participant to recreation participation characterized by (a) the single recreation activity most frequently participated in, and (b) the set of three activities most frequently participated in; and (3) characterization of the recreationist as a social group (household) to recreation participation characterized by (a) the single recreation activity most frequently participated in, and (b) the set of three activities most frequently participated in. Data for this study were drawn from a 1967-1968 survey of Texas Households (n=7500) using interview techniques in a stratified random sample. Seven thousand one hundred and nine useful cases were drawn upon for socio-economic variables characterizing (1) the individual respondent and (2) the household members collectively. These variables were: age, income, sex, and ethnicity for the respondent; mean age, per capita income, mean sex (0.0 male-1.0 female), and ethnicity for the household. From a list of frequencies of participation in each of 63 outdoor recreation activities, recreation behavior was characterized by (1) the single activity most frequently participated in during the preceding year, and (2) the permutation (set of) three activities most frequently participated in during the preceding year.. | en |
dc.format.extent | xii, 142 leaves | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.rights | This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use. | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
dc.subject | Recreation | en |
dc.subject | Research | en |
dc.subject | Recreation and Resources Development | en |
dc.subject.classification | 1976 Dissertation S916 | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Recreation | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Research | en |
dc.title | A comparison of methods of characterizing recreationists and recreation behavior | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.grantor | Texas A&M University | en |
thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Carter, | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Cheek, Jr., Neil H. | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Schaffer, Ruth C. | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Suggitt, Frank W. | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Teer, James G. | |
dc.type.genre | dissertations | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | reformatted digital | en |
dc.publisher.digital | Texas A&M University. Libraries | |
dc.identifier.oclc | 3032504 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.