Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGriffin, James M.
dc.creatorJones, Clifton Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T21:40:59Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T21:40:59Z
dc.date.issued1985
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-420073
dc.descriptionTypescript (photocopy).en
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation considers the impact of the federal windfall profit tax (WPT) on aggregate Texas petroleum production. First, an engineering-based economic model is developed that incorporates both the geophysical aspects and economic and policy determinants of competitive petroleum production while allowing for the augmentation of the petroleum reserve base by new infill drilling, the abandonment and re-opening of individual wells extracting from that reserve base, and the effects of production prorationing by state regulatory agencies. The resulting generalized petroleum production model is then econometrically estimated using data from individual oil and gas reservoirs in Texas. After finding that the generalized model performs adequately at the microeconomic level of the individual petroleum reservoir, it is next successfully applied to an analysis of aggregate Texas petroleum production. A simulation model of future aggregate Texas petroleum production from all sources is completed by including an econometric model of future oil production attributable to enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods. This production model is then combined with an existing econometric model of petroleum drilling in Texas to fashion an integrated simulation model of aggregate petroleum production from a growing reserve base that is constantly being augmented by new reserve additions coming from drilling activity. The integrated model is used to simulate future aggregate Texas production levels from 1984 through 2003 under three alternative WPT phaseout scenarios - repeal of the WPT on 1-1-84, phaseout according to current law, and no phaseout whatsoever. The production differences and welfare effects that would result from changing the status quo phaseout schedule of the WPT to either of the two extremes of immediate repeal or indefinite extension are then determined. General conclusions and policy recommendations regarding the WPT complete the analysis.en
dc.format.extentxii, 280 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectErdölförderungen
dc.subjectGewinnen
dc.subjectUnternehmensbesteuerungen
dc.subjectWindfall Profiten
dc.subjectTexasen
dc.subjectPetroleumen
dc.subjectTaxationen
dc.subjectMajor economicsen
dc.subject.classification1985 Dissertation J76
dc.subject.lcshPetroleumen
dc.subject.lcshTaxationen
dc.subject.lcshTexasen
dc.titleTexas petroleum production and the windfall profit taxen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. Den
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBattalio, Raymond C.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHocking, Ronald R.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMoroney, John R.
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc13911664


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record