Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorChittenden, M. E., Jr.
dc.creatorMatlock, Gary C.
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T21:38:28Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T21:38:28Z
dc.date.issued1984
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-406585
dc.descriptionTypescript (photocopy).en
dc.description.abstractThe life cycle of red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) is generally well known and consists of spawning in the Gulf of Mexico or Atlantic Ocean in the late summer and fall, utilization of estuarine nurseries, and return to the gulf or ocean at age III to V. However, many details of the life history are unclear or unknown. Estimates of life history parameters except length-weight relationships are generally imprecise, undocumented, or unknown. Long-term trends in size composition and stock abundance are generally unknown, but recent evidence suggests that recent recruitment to the spawning population may have been small, in part possibly associated with the lack of hurricanes during the spawning season. Spawner-recruit relationships have not been examined. Habitat requirements are generally unknown. Red drum harvest has occurred mainly in estuaries throughout the year by commercial and recreational fishermen. The exact harvest is unknown but exceeds 500,000 fish and 500,000 kg. Less than 636 commercial fishermen using nets and trotlines harvest most of these fish. There are at least 500,000 red drum anglers. Total economic impacts (retail level) of commercial fishermen were generally less than $7 million while those of anglers were over $118 million. The commercial fishery supplied at least 66,000 consumers with red drum while the recreational fishery supplied at least 61,000 consumers.Red drum populations do not have a great biological capacity to withstand growth overfishing. Therefore, a conservative approach to management of this species is suggested, especially since the best available data indicate growth overfishing has occurred. This has been the approach of past management, but increasing fishing demands might warrant additional action for conservative management. Possible alternatives are presented, including: harvest restrictions, habitat improvements, stocking, and participant limitations.en
dc.format.extentxxv, 291 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectWildlife and Fisheries Sciencesen
dc.subject.classification1984 Dissertation M433
dc.subject.lcshRed drumen
dc.subject.lcshTexasen
dc.subject.lcshFishery managementen
dc.subject.lcshTexasen
dc.titleA basis for the development of a management plan for red drum in Texasen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinePhilosophyen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. D. in Philosophyen
thesis.degree.levelDoctorialen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberDitton, R. B.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberNoble, Richard L.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberStrawn, R. K.
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc13417260


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access