NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
A comparison between the effect of success oriented and failure oriented cognitions on motor performance
dc.contributor.advisor | Smith, Darrell | |
dc.creator | Smith, W. Truett | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-02T21:00:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-02T21:00:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1986 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-24227 | |
dc.description | Typescript (photocopy). | en |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of the present study was to compare the effect of success oriented versus failure oriented mental preparation strategies on an arm strength task. The study was conducted in a manner such that the theoretical basis for the psych-up effect could be examined. The sample (N = 20) consisted of extramural/club sport level, male, athletes, a heretofore untapped population. Subjects were instructed to prepare using a combination of imagery and self-efficacy statements, methods suggested in the literature as effective for altering self-efficacy expectations. The success condition stressed success and competence, and the failure condition stressed failure and incompetence. The subjects, all volunteers, were recruited by the investigator. Subjects engaged in two trials of an isometric arm strength task under each of the two mental preparation conditions. Performance was assessed via an isometric arm flexion device which measured force applied to a load cell. Resultant data were subjected to a one-way analysis of variance with repeated measures. Results of the study indicated there was a significant difference (p < .05) between the two conditions. Three conclusions were drawn. It appears that preparing mentally by stressing success and competence, and preparing mentally by stressing failure and incompetence results in differential strength performance. Additionally, direct alteration of self-efficacy expectations resulted in quantitatively distinct strength performance. Lastly, the psych-up effect was extended to a new, and important, population. Recommendations for future research included replicating the present study with the addition of a control condition, investigating each of the five identified psych-up strategies in a positive versus a negative manner, exploring additional combinations of strategies, assessing the levels of self-efficacy and arousal in studies similar to the present investigation, and extending research efforts in the direction of younger subjects. | en |
dc.format.extent | ix, 67 leaves | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.rights | This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use. | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
dc.subject | Major counseling psychology | en |
dc.subject.classification | 1986 Dissertation S663 | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Sports | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Psychological aspects | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | College sports | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Cognition | en |
dc.title | A comparison between the effect of success oriented and failure oriented cognitions on motor performance | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | Counseling Psychology | en |
thesis.degree.grantor | Texas A&M University | en |
thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
thesis.degree.name | Ph. D. in Counseling Psychology | en |
thesis.degree.level | Doctorial | en |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Barker, Donald G. | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Hope, Lannes H. | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | LeUnes, Arnold D. | |
dc.type.genre | dissertations | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | reformatted digital | en |
dc.publisher.digital | Texas A&M University. Libraries | |
dc.identifier.oclc | 18078632 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.