Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSmith, Darrell
dc.creatorSmith, W. Truett
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T21:00:50Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T21:00:50Z
dc.date.issued1986
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-24227
dc.descriptionTypescript (photocopy).en
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the present study was to compare the effect of success oriented versus failure oriented mental preparation strategies on an arm strength task. The study was conducted in a manner such that the theoretical basis for the psych-up effect could be examined. The sample (N = 20) consisted of extramural/club sport level, male, athletes, a heretofore untapped population. Subjects were instructed to prepare using a combination of imagery and self-efficacy statements, methods suggested in the literature as effective for altering self-efficacy expectations. The success condition stressed success and competence, and the failure condition stressed failure and incompetence. The subjects, all volunteers, were recruited by the investigator. Subjects engaged in two trials of an isometric arm strength task under each of the two mental preparation conditions. Performance was assessed via an isometric arm flexion device which measured force applied to a load cell. Resultant data were subjected to a one-way analysis of variance with repeated measures. Results of the study indicated there was a significant difference (p < .05) between the two conditions. Three conclusions were drawn. It appears that preparing mentally by stressing success and competence, and preparing mentally by stressing failure and incompetence results in differential strength performance. Additionally, direct alteration of self-efficacy expectations resulted in quantitatively distinct strength performance. Lastly, the psych-up effect was extended to a new, and important, population. Recommendations for future research included replicating the present study with the addition of a control condition, investigating each of the five identified psych-up strategies in a positive versus a negative manner, exploring additional combinations of strategies, assessing the levels of self-efficacy and arousal in studies similar to the present investigation, and extending research efforts in the direction of younger subjects.en
dc.format.extentix, 67 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectMajor counseling psychologyen
dc.subject.classification1986 Dissertation S663
dc.subject.lcshSportsen
dc.subject.lcshPsychological aspectsen
dc.subject.lcshCollege sportsen
dc.subject.lcshCognitionen
dc.titleA comparison between the effect of success oriented and failure oriented cognitions on motor performanceen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineCounseling Psychologyen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. D. in Counseling Psychologyen
thesis.degree.levelDoctorialen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBarker, Donald G.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHope, Lannes H.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLeUnes, Arnold D.
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc18078632


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access