Show simple item record

dc.creatorJayakrishnan, Rajaraman
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-03T21:23:07Z
dc.date.available2020-09-03T21:23:07Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-2072214
dc.descriptionVita.en
dc.description.abstractRainfall, one of the most important hydrologic model inputs, varies spatially and temporally. Simulations using rainfall data with a reasonable representation of this variability can be expected to produce better results for hydrologic system responses. Raingage rainfall data that have been used in hydrologic analyses involve several disadvantages: they are only point observations; their availability for subdaily time steps is very limited. Rainfall data from weather radars overcome these disadvantages. Effect of using spatially and temporally varied rainfall data on hydrologic simulation was analyzed in this study. Stage III WSR-88D radar rainfall data with sixteen square kilometer spatial resolution and one hour temporal resolution were used for this analysis. Soil and Water Assessment Tool, a distributed parameter hydrologic model, was used for hydrologic simulation in six watersheds located in Texas and New Mexico for the period 1994-99 without model parameter calibration. Results were compared with those obtained using raingage data. Rainfall data of the nearest raingage was assigned to each subbasin in this analysis. High spatial and temporal variability of rainfall was observed in the study area. In general, radar data underpredicted streamflow while raingage data resulted in overprediction. Evaluation of WSR-88D data quality is necessary before applying them in hydrologic modeling. Quality of Stage III WSR-88D rainfall data over the Texas-Gulf basin was evaluated using available raingage data. WSR-88D performance varied significantly over this basin. Radar performance was satisfactory at about 50% of the raingage locations. Bias adjustment of Stage III radar data was done using daily raingage data by calculating a daily Bias Adjustment Factor (BAF). Daily Stage III radar data were adjusted using BAF values. Hydrologic simulation efficiency improved with the use of bias-adjusted radar data. Selective bias adjustment for rainfall events with a flexible range for BAF may improve the results further. Analyses using temporally varying radar and raingage data suggested that consideration of rainfall temporal variability could improve the simulation results. High resolution Stage III WSR-88D rainfall data are useful for incorporating rainfall variability in hydrologic modeling and they will play an important role in short-term flood prediction and long-term waters resources planning studies.en
dc.format.extentxiv, 159 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectMajor agricultural engineeringen
dc.subject.classification2001 Dissertation J37
dc.titleEffect of rainfall variability on hydrologic simulation using WSR-88D (NEXRAD) dataen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. Den
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc49782871


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access