Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCartwright, T. C.
dc.creatorLong, Charles Ra
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T21:01:37Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T21:01:37Z
dc.date.issued1972
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-184889
dc.description.abstractPerformance data on Angus, Charolais, Hereford and Jersey cows and their straightbred and F₁ progeny at the Texas A&M University Agricultural Research Center at McGregor, supplemented with estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters from the literature, provided the basis for a linear programming model designed to facilitate examination of sources of variation for productive efficiency of beef cattle systems. The effects of specific differences in milk yield, fertility level, productive longevity and cow size and progeny growth were examined along with the effects of heterosis and complementarity associated with various breeding plans. Three straight breeding systems involving small (S), medium (M) and large (L) cows, with mature weights of 430, 500 and 600 kg, were used as a basis for the breeding systems considered. Four systems were employed to simulate the production of F₁ slaughter progeny: LS, SM, LM and SL by mating large (L) and small (S) sires to small (S), medium (M) and large (L) dams. All slaughter progeny in these vertically integrated systems were fed to a constant proportion of mature weight. Two nutritional regimes were employed to estimate and satisfy nutrient requirements. Regime I involved least cost rations balanced for DP, ME and DM; regime II was characterized by the use of pasture and harvested forage. The model included fixed costs, relationships between cow size and progeny growth, different attrition rates and milk yields for cows of different ages and other considerations deemed necessary to make it trustworthy. The criterion for evaluating efficiency was net return to a fixed investment for nutrients. Average daily milk yields of 3.0, 5.0 and 7.0 kg were compared. In regime I, 5.0 kg was 0.18% and 1.85% more efficient than 3.0 and 7.0 kg, whereas for II, with cows converting relatively inexpensive forage into milk, 7.0 kg was 6.56% and 2.17% more efficient than 3.0 and 5.0 kg. ...en
dc.format.extent155 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectMajor animal breedingen
dc.subject.classification1972 Dissertation L848
dc.titleApplication of mathematical programming to evaluation of systems of beef cattle breedingen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineAnimal Breedingen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. D. in Animal Breedingen
thesis.degree.levelDoctorialen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberFitzhugh, H. A.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberFruend, R. J.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSmith, James D.
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc5783294


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access