Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBeatty, Paulette T.
dc.creatorHoffer, Sharon Marie
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T20:37:17Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T20:37:17Z
dc.date.issued1986
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-16983
dc.descriptionTypescript (photocopy).en
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the study was to determine if adults learn more effectively through a dominant sensory modality across or within subject matter. A set of 12 activities and tests was designed to teach concepts and rules and to measure concept, rule, and problem solving learning in four modes: auditory, visual, "auditahm", and "visitahm", the latter two being subcategories of the tactual-kinesthetic mode. Three activities containing language, science, and mathematics types of subject matter were presented in each mode. A questionnaire was designed to obtain the participants' age, sex, years of formal schooling, levels of school achievement, and preferred and most effective learning modes. The sample for the study consisted of 63 adult volunteers whose ages ranged from 25 to 74. The measurement of the participants1 learning resulted in the formation of the following groups: 16 auditory, 16 visual, 16 auditahm, and 15 visitahm dominant mode learners. The findings of the study showed that each dominant mode group learned mare effectively in the activities presented in their dominant mode across at least two subject matter areas. There was no single prevailing mode in which the majority of the participants learned mare effectively in any subject matter area. Dominant mode learning was related to sex, but was independent of age, years of formal schooling, and self-reported levels of school achievement. A substantial amount of qualitative information, was provided by the adult learners who participated in the piloting and measurement phases of the study. This information was used to identify the elements in learning activities and tests which characterize a meaningful learning experience for adults. The study had three major conclusions: (a) adults do possess a dominant sensory modality through which they learn more effectively across subject matter, (b) multimodal instruction is not as beneficial for adult learners as instruction presented in their dominant learning modes, and (c) auditahm and visitahm learners are two distinct types of tactual-kinesthetic learners.en
dc.format.extentxii, 196 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectMajor adult and extension educationen
dc.subject.classification1986 Dissertation H698
dc.subject.lcshLearning, Psychology ofen
dc.subject.lcshAdult educationen
dc.subject.lcshResearchen
dc.subject.lcshPerceptual learningen
dc.titleAdult learning styles : auditory, visual, and tactual-kinesthetic sensory modalitiesen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. Den
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBarker, Donald G.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberConti, Gary J.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberFellenz, Robert A.
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc17630721


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access