Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorErlandson, David A.
dc.creatorTurner, Judy Carol
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T20:37:08Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T20:37:08Z
dc.date.issued1986
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-16561
dc.descriptionTypescript (photocopy).en
dc.description.abstractThe primary objective of this study was to identify the issues which will have the highest probability of occurrence in higher education in the coming two decades, and to determine the level of impact of change in higher education that these significant issues will exhibit. A panel of eleven expert futurists was selected to complete an eight-part propositional inventory, which comprised 134 issues. The eight major categories of inquiry were the following: Egalitarian Movement, Changing Enrollment, Academic Reform, Manpower and the Declining Value of a College Degree, Governance, Diversity and Competition, New Faculty, and Economic Accountability. The 1985 panelists' responses were compared to those in a similar study conducted by Miloy in 1978. The issues which were rated high in probability and in impact for each year-group were identified as salient issues. When these issues were evaluated, the difference between the two year-groups for those issues which were rated high in both probability and impact was not found to be statistically significant. Higher educational planners continue to hold these same eight issues as the most important problems for educational administrators to resolve. Appendices to this study include a copy of the propositional inventory and a short biography on each of the experts who are consulted. The recommendations resulting from this study were the following: (1) because tomorrow will not be like today, administrators of higher education should seek out forecasting experts in order to effectively plan for future events, (2) the administrators should continually review their programs to insure that the use of the eight major categories of inquiry meet the changing needs of the students, (3) researchers should replicate this study at the end of this decade in order to see if the attitudes have changed.en
dc.format.extentxiv, 226 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectMajor educational administrationen
dc.subject.classification1986 Dissertation T948
dc.subject.lcshEducation, Higheren
dc.subject.lcshAims and objectivesen
dc.subject.lcshUnited Statesen
dc.subject.lcshPublic universities and collegesen
dc.subject.lcshUnited Statesen
dc.subject.lcshEducationen
dc.subject.lcshForecastingen
dc.subject.lcshUnited Statesen
dc.titleThe American public university in 2005 : forecasting for progress in higher educationen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineEducational Administrationen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. D. in Educational Administrationen
thesis.degree.levelDoctorialen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBorman, Christopher A.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHinojosa, Daivd
dc.contributor.committeeMemberStark, Stephen L.
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc17592915


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access