NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
Natural assessment of oral language proficiency of limited English proficient students in paired reciprocal learning
dc.contributor.advisor | Lara-Alecio, Rafael | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Parker, Richard | |
dc.creator | Gomez, Leo | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-02T20:24:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-02T20:24:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1994 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-1554389 | |
dc.description | Vita. | en |
dc.description.abstract | This study describes a naturalistic oral language assessment instrument used to determine language growth of limited English proficient (LEP) students in paired and non-paired learning environments. The purpose of this study was: (a) to assess the relationship between paired learning and oral language proficiency, and (b) to develop a direct observation language assessment instrument that observed English language use in its natural context that was both grammatical and functional. Based on the data presented in this study, it can be concluded that: 1. The English language growth of paired learners was either not effectively detected by the assessment instrument over the span of the study, or there was no growth at all. The non-paired learners demonstrated greater English language growth than the paired learners, although gains were also small. 2. The Naturalistic Assessment of Oral English Proficiency (NAOEP) instrument developed in this study: (a) exhibited good inter-rater reliability on all language variables, but still requires further refinement of specific language item descriptors, (b) demonstrated a general lack of score stability over time for both groups affecting the trustworthiness of the instrument, and (c) effectively measured non-language behaviors, but lacked the sensitivity to measure language growth in peer interaction due to the variety of communication forms involved. The NAOEP instrument can effectively be used by teachers in informal oral language assessment of individual students as they interact in the classroom. However, the instrument is impractical for use with large numbers of students. Various factors have possibly influenced the results of this study. The lack of stability of scores, short number of weeks, number and length of observations, and lack of sensitivity all may have contributed to the results. Caution should be taken with the interpretation of findings. | en |
dc.format.extent | xiii, 150 leaves | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.rights | This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use. | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
dc.subject | Major curriculum and instruction | en |
dc.subject.classification | 1994 Dissertation G6334 | |
dc.title | Natural assessment of oral language proficiency of limited English proficient students in paired reciprocal learning | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.grantor | Texas A&M University | en |
thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
thesis.degree.name | Ph. D | en |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Kracht, James B. | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Theosbald, Paul | |
dc.type.genre | dissertations | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | reformatted digital | en |
dc.publisher.digital | Texas A&M University. Libraries | |
dc.identifier.oclc | 34846240 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.