Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLara-Alecio, Rafael
dc.contributor.advisorParker, Richard
dc.creatorGomez, Leo
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T20:24:16Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T20:24:16Z
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-1554389
dc.descriptionVita.en
dc.description.abstractThis study describes a naturalistic oral language assessment instrument used to determine language growth of limited English proficient (LEP) students in paired and non-paired learning environments. The purpose of this study was: (a) to assess the relationship between paired learning and oral language proficiency, and (b) to develop a direct observation language assessment instrument that observed English language use in its natural context that was both grammatical and functional. Based on the data presented in this study, it can be concluded that: 1. The English language growth of paired learners was either not effectively detected by the assessment instrument over the span of the study, or there was no growth at all. The non-paired learners demonstrated greater English language growth than the paired learners, although gains were also small. 2. The Naturalistic Assessment of Oral English Proficiency (NAOEP) instrument developed in this study: (a) exhibited good inter-rater reliability on all language variables, but still requires further refinement of specific language item descriptors, (b) demonstrated a general lack of score stability over time for both groups affecting the trustworthiness of the instrument, and (c) effectively measured non-language behaviors, but lacked the sensitivity to measure language growth in peer interaction due to the variety of communication forms involved. The NAOEP instrument can effectively be used by teachers in informal oral language assessment of individual students as they interact in the classroom. However, the instrument is impractical for use with large numbers of students. Various factors have possibly influenced the results of this study. The lack of stability of scores, short number of weeks, number and length of observations, and lack of sensitivity all may have contributed to the results. Caution should be taken with the interpretation of findings.en
dc.format.extentxiii, 150 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectMajor curriculum and instructionen
dc.subject.classification1994 Dissertation G6334
dc.titleNatural assessment of oral language proficiency of limited English proficient students in paired reciprocal learningen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. Den
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKracht, James B.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberTheosbald, Paul
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc34846240


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access