NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
Structured writing versus free writing with limited English proficient students
dc.contributor.advisor | Lara-Alecio, Rafael | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Parker, Richard | |
dc.creator | Gomez, Richard | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-02T20:24:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-02T20:24:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1994 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-1554388 | |
dc.description | Vita. | en |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this study was to ascertain which teaching strategy, structured or free writing, is most effective in teaching writing skills to elementary grade limited English proficient (LEP) students. Furthermore, is there a difference in writing productivity between students engaged in free writing every day and students engaged in free writing every other day. The study sample consisted of 72 fifth grade LEP students. The study utilized a time series design with single-subject repeated measures over a six week period of time. Since students' scores were measured weekly, it was necessary to first establish reliability for stability of scores over time. Ten indicators were used to evaluate the dependent variable, writing. They were: Total Words, Percent of Correct Words, Percent of Correct Word Sequence, Mean Length of Correct Words, Topic of Composition, Mechanics, Internal Organization of Thoughts, Conveying Meaning, Sentence Construction, and Holistic Scoring. | en |
dc.format.extent | xii, 183 leaves | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.rights | This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use. | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
dc.subject | Major curriculum and instruction | en |
dc.subject.classification | 1994 Dissertation G6337 | |
dc.title | Structured writing versus free writing with limited English proficient students | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.grantor | Texas A&M University | en |
thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
thesis.degree.name | Ph. D | en |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Kracht, James B. | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Theobald, Paul | |
dc.type.genre | dissertations | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | reformatted digital | en |
dc.publisher.digital | Texas A&M University. Libraries | |
dc.identifier.oclc | 34846233 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.