Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGarcia, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.advisorSeaman, Don F.
dc.creatorBaugh, Janet Kay
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T20:16:23Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T20:16:23Z
dc.date.issued1993
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-1476044
dc.descriptionVita.en
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to determine how well the Specialty Knowledge Tests (SKTs) selected for this study matched the airman population assigned to their respective Air Force career fields in regard to reading grade level (RGL). The specific research question that was examined in this study was to determine how closely the mean RGLs of each of the 20 E-5 SKTs matched the mean entrance RGLs of the airman population in each of the 20 corresponding Air Force specialties at the mean RGL or within 1 standard deviation (SD) below the mean RGL of the airman population (reduced RGL). Previous readability researchers have concentrated on using RGL formulas to estimate the RGLs of prose. In contrast, only a few studies were found that estimated the readability of multiple-choice tests. For this study, the FORCAST Readability Formula (Caylor, Sticht, Fox, & Ford, 1973) was used to collect the data and estimate the RGLs of each of the SKTs. In addition, the instructions were adapted to be applicable for use with multiple-choice tests. The basic design of this study was a comparison of the mean RGLs of the 20 E-5 SKTs selected for this study and the mean entrance RGLs of the airman population in the corresponding Air Force specialties. Then the mean RGL scores from each of the SKTs were compared to the mean entrance RGL scores of airmen in each of their respective Air Force specialties using data from Faneuff's (1990) "Reading Grade Level on the Air Force Reading Abilities Test (AFRAT) Scale." The results of this study indicated that all of the estimated mean RGLs of the 20 E-5 SKTs were above the mean RGLs and reduced RGLs of the airman population from the corresponding Air Force specialties. Therefore, the RGLs did not match. It was concluded that the readability levels of the 20 E-5 SKTS selected for this study were written above the reading abilities of the airman population from each corresponding Air Force specialty.en
dc.format.extentxii, 131 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectUnited Statesen
dc.subjectAir Forceen
dc.subjectMajor adult and extension educationen
dc.subjectArmed Forcesen
dc.subjectAirmenen
dc.subjectExaminationsen
dc.subjectInterpretationen
dc.subjectVocational educationen
dc.subject.classification1993 Dissertation B346
dc.subject.lcshUnited Statesen
dc.subject.lcshAir Forceen
dc.subject.lcshAirmenen
dc.subject.lcshExaminationsen
dc.subject.lcshWorkplace literacyen
dc.subject.lcshVocational educationen
dc.subject.lcshTerminologyen
dc.subject.lcshExaminationsen
dc.subject.lcshInterpretationen
dc.titleComparison of readability of specialty knowledge tests to reading abilities of Air Force enlisted personnelen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. Den
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBarker, Donald G.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHouseholder, Daniel L.
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc32372481


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access