Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBeatty, Paulette T.
dc.creatorKoiner, John H.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T20:12:30Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T20:12:30Z
dc.date.issued1992
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-1307083
dc.descriptionTypescript (photocopy).en
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was three fold: first, to determine the locus of control (LOC) orientation of doctoral students using the Internal (I), Powerful Others (P), and Chance (C) Scales, developed by Dr. Hanna Levenson; secondly, to determine if significant LOC differences existed between students at different doctoral stages; with different genders; at different ages; off- versus on-campus; Ph.D. and Ed.D. and among the different majors; thirdly, do the LOC test results support the self-reported information? This study consisted of 344 volunteer doctoral students in the School of Education, Texas A&M University. The response rate was 72% of a total population of 480. The findings from ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test of multiple comparison indicate significant differences at the .05 level in Powerful Others LOC (PLOC) scores between Counseling Psychology students and Physical Education, Educational Administration and Educational Curriculum and Instruction students. Significant differences in Chance LOC (CLOC) scores were noted between Adult and Extension Education and Educational Curriculum and Instruction students. There was a significant difference at the .05 level in the PLOC Mean score between Ed.D. students and Ph.D. students. The self-reported information on the student questionnaire was congruent with the LOC test results in 73% of the cases with regard to the Internal Locus of Control (ILOC) only. No other statistically significant differences were disclosed. Differences that may be worthy of noting: i.e., ILOC students were more homogeneous; female students scored higher ILOC scores than males and the older students scored higher ILOC scores. Off-campus students scored higher ILOC scores. An ILOC orientation may be the singularly most preferred LOC orientation for the successful pursuit of a doctorate. A Balanced Locus of Control (BLOC) between ILOC and PLOC orientations may be even more beneficial to the students' successful completion of a doctorate.en
dc.format.extentx, 79 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectMajor adult educationen
dc.subject.classification1992 Dissertation K79
dc.subject.lcshGraduate studentsen
dc.subject.lcshPsychologyen
dc.subject.lcshEducationen
dc.subject.lcshStudy and teaching (Graduate)en
dc.subject.lcshLocus of controlen
dc.titleRelationship of the locus of control orientation of graduate students in education to their success in pursuing a doctorate degreeen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. Den
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSeaman, Don F.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSmith, Darrell
dc.contributor.committeeMemberStark, Stephen L.
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc27964924


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access