Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRoeseler, Wolfgang G.
dc.creatorVon Dosky, Doris
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T20:11:48Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T20:11:48Z
dc.date.issued1990
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-1174808
dc.descriptionTypescript (photocopy).en
dc.description.abstractAccelerated population growth in general and increasing expanse and intensity of metropolitan development throughout the world have focused attention on urban and public transportation and growth management in some form. The high cost of modern urban highways and mass transit systems, coupled with the necessity of guiding the private use of land toward of urban investment strategies. Among these strategies, the concept of joint development of transportation facilities and high activity nodes has emerged as a promising solution of some critical transportation and congestion problems in leading metropolitan areas around the world Joint development applications have been especially effective in connection with rapid transit station development. Moreover, integrated public and private investment not only tends to maximize cost effectiveness of given facilities, but offers opportunities for value capture for public benefit at large, a key consideration in today's tight fiscal situations everywhere. This study was undertaken to examine some of the requisites to effective joint development of transit stations in leading metropolitan areas. The test systems included the metropolitan areas to Toronto, Montreal, Washington D. C., San Francisco, Atlanta and Paris. In all instances, it was found that fixed guideway rapid transit had a discernible, positive impact upon urban growth and intra-urban transportation, provided opportunities for imaginative growth management, and was an inducement for private investment. Conversely, effective application of this strategy required the preexistence of economic viability in the area as a whole, but especially of the transportation corridor of which the respective transit lines were an integral part. Transit by itself, with or without joint development, would not induce economic viability. Where such viability exists, however, several determinants can be identified consistently that are requisites to success or, in their absence, tend to explain disappointing results...en
dc.format.extentx, 97 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectMajor urban and regional scienceen
dc.subject.classification1990 Dissertation V946
dc.subject.lcshLocal transit stationsen
dc.subject.lcshEconomic aspectsen
dc.subject.lcshLand use, Urbanen
dc.subject.lcshTransportationen
dc.subject.lcshPlanningen
dc.titleJoint development of rapid transit nodes : opportunities for directed economic development in metropolitan areasen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. Den
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHinojosa, Jesus H.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMaxwell, Donald A.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSafwat, K. Nabil
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc24159979


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access