Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHughes, Jan N.
dc.creatorRobinson, Mary Ann Springer
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T22:10:15Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T22:10:15Z
dc.date.issued1990
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-1117205
dc.descriptionTypescript (photocopy).en
dc.description.abstractAggressive/rejected and nonaggressive/accepted boys' attributions concerning the intentions of peer protagonists in social situations with positive outcomes were compared under hypothetical and real-life conditions. Hypotheses were, first, that aggressive/rejected boys, in comparison to their nonaggressive peers, would demonstrate systematic tendencies to underattribute benevolent intentions to other children when their actions result in positive outcomes for peers. Also hypothesized was that aggressive/rejected boys would infer significantly fewer positive intentions to peers who instigated positive outcomes for them. Subjects were 54 boys in third and fourth grades in racially integrated, low- to middle-income schools. Twenty-seven aggressive/rejected and 27 nonaggressive/accepted subjects were identified on the basis of classroom sociometric measures and peer nominations for descriptions of aggressive behavior. All subjects were individually interviewed by the examiner. To test the first hypothesis, subjects were presented with a series of ten vignettes, each featuring different boys involved in social situations which end positively but in which the intentions of the protagonists are left unclear. At the conclusion of each vignette, children were asked to describe the intentions of the protagonist. Their responses were recorded verbatim. At the conclusion of the interview, the examiner offered each boy a prize and explained that another boy had left it for the subject. The subjects' attributions for the peer's intentions constituted the real-life measure. Subjects' responses to both measures were categorized as either positive, negative, or neutral. Relative to nonaggressive/accepted boys, aggressive/rejected boys displayed a bias toward underattributing positive intentions to peers who instigated positive outcomes for them. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for future research and for therapeutic intervention with aggressive/rejected children.en
dc.format.extentx, 193 leaves ;en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectMajor school psychologyen
dc.subject.classification1990 Dissertation R663
dc.subject.lcshInteraction analysis in educationen
dc.subject.lcshSocial interaction in childrenen
dc.subject.lcshSocial psychologyen
dc.subject.lcshResearchen
dc.titleAggressive/rejected and nonaggressive/accepted children's attributions for prosocial behaviorsen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. Den
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBarker, Donald G.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberJones, Diane Carlson
dc.contributor.committeeMemberPalmer, Douglas J.
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc23005876


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access