Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHickman, Larry
dc.creatorRudd, Terry
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T16:12:11Z
dc.date.available2022-06-30T16:12:11Z
dc.date.issued1983
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/CAPSTONE-RuddT_1983
dc.descriptionProgram year: 1982-1983en
dc.descriptionDigitized from print original stored in HDRen
dc.description.abstractWhat is the relation of mind to body? Are there separate entities called "mind" and "body," or is there only one kind of substance of which they are manifestations. If so, what is that one kind of substance? These are the questions which philosophers have traditionally called the “mind-body problem.” I will first review the history of the mind-body problem from Descartes to the present and present the basic stance of each of the major theories. These include: interactionism, occasionalism, parallelism, pre-established harmony, epiphenomenalism, idealism, materialism, the double aspect theory, and functionalism. Following this, I will review the traditional arguments for dualism and then argue that the functionalism of William James and the phenomenology of Maurice Merleau-Ponty give the strongest insight into the mind-body problem. Finally, I will incorporate the literature of psychotropics as empirical support for the philosophical model.en
dc.format.extent32 pagesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.subjectmind-body problemen
dc.subjectdualismen
dc.subjectfunctionalismen
dc.subjectphilosophyen
dc.subjectpsychotropicsen
dc.titleRethinking the Mind-Body Problemen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentPhilosophyen
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity Undergraduate Fellowsen
thesis.degree.levelUndergraduateen
dc.type.materialtexten


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record