Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGrau, James W.
dc.creatorPrentice, Thomas W.
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-01T13:49:20Z
dc.date.available2022-04-01T13:49:20Z
dc.date.issued1993
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/CAPSTONE-PrenticeT_1993
dc.descriptionProgram year: 1992/1993en
dc.descriptionDigitized from print original stored in HDRen
dc.description.abstractIn this research, it was attempted to elicit the phenomenon of spinally activated antinociception. Surprisingly, the effect failed to be observed. We then attempted to determine whether the effect was due to a difference in surgical or testing procedures. Since it was due to testing, we then atempted to determine if the loss of antinociception was due to pre- or post shock testing procedures. It was determined that it was probably due to an unknown sensory cue present in the post shock proceduresen
dc.format.extent23 pagesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.subjectantinociceptionen
dc.subjectshock testingen
dc.subjectspinally activated antinociceptionen
dc.subjectsensory cueen
dc.titleFailure To Observe Spinal Antinociceptionen
dc.title.alternativeFailure to Observe Spinal Antinociceptionen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentPsychologyen
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity Undergraduate Fellowen
thesis.degree.levelUndergraduateen
dc.type.materialtexten


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record