dc.contributor.advisor | Grau, James W. | |
dc.creator | Prentice, Thomas W. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-01T13:49:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-01T13:49:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1993 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/CAPSTONE-PrenticeT_1993 | |
dc.description | Program year: 1992/1993 | en |
dc.description | Digitized from print original stored in HDR | en |
dc.description.abstract | In this research, it was attempted to elicit the phenomenon of spinally activated antinociception. Surprisingly, the effect failed to be observed. We then attempted to determine whether the effect was due to a difference in surgical or testing procedures. Since it was due to testing, we then atempted to determine if the loss of antinociception was due to pre- or post shock testing procedures. It was determined that it was probably due to an unknown sensory cue present in the post shock procedures | en |
dc.format.extent | 23 pages | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.subject | antinociception | en |
dc.subject | shock testing | en |
dc.subject | spinally activated antinociception | en |
dc.subject | sensory cue | en |
dc.title | Failure To Observe Spinal Antinociception | en |
dc.title.alternative | Failure to Observe Spinal Antinociception | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.department | Psychology | en |
thesis.degree.grantor | University Undergraduate Fellow | en |
thesis.degree.level | Undergraduate | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |