Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorReynolds, Morgan O.
dc.creatorHoffer, Dana Bryan
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-01T15:11:14Z
dc.date.available2022-04-01T15:11:14Z
dc.date.issued1987
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/CAPSTONE-HofferD_1987
dc.descriptionProgram year: 1996/1997en
dc.descriptionDigitized from print original stored in HDRen
dc.description.abstractMany businesses are not persuaded that advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) will bring large gains in manufacturing efficiency. The businesses, however, which rely upon traditional financial decision tools may be in error due to their restrictive application of justification analyses which indicate that investment in AMT is unprofitable. This study analyzes the characteristics of AMT and appropriate justification techniques in an effort to explain the paradox between the promise of AMT and impression of AMT in the business world. The discussion reviews the factors in the AMT process. Journal articles and survey results--a questionnaire survey conducted by the author in England in November 1986 to gauge current corporate attitudes and actions about AMT--are the primary bases for discussion.en
dc.format.extent63 pagesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.subjectadvanced manufacturing technologyen
dc.subjectinvestment decision toolsen
dc.subjectmanufacturing efficiencyen
dc.titleEconomic And Technological Factors In Industrial Automationen
dc.title.alternativeECONOMIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL FACTORS IN INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATIONen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentEconomicsen
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity Undergraduate Fellowen
thesis.degree.levelUndergraduateen
dc.type.materialtexten


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record