Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHill, K. Quaile
dc.creatorHenderson, Jennifer L.
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-01T15:06:50Z
dc.date.available2022-04-01T15:06:50Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/CAPSTONE-HendersonJ_1997
dc.descriptionProgram year: 1996/1997en
dc.descriptionDigitized from print original stored in HDRen
dc.description.abstractA number of Sociologists and Political Scientists have used what is called the Power Theory to explain political relationships between ethnic groups. Political Science research using this theory concludes that the more politically threatened the majority ethnic group feels, the more politically active its group members are. Yet there are reasons to suspect that existing research has not accurately tested Power Theory propositions. In this study, I offer new empirical tests of Power Theory propositions about ethnic majority political behavior that are designed to avoid the limitations of past research. My two research questions involve the political participation and ideology of the majority group members under varying degrees of political threat. While the predicted relationships between the variables were not as strong as in the past research, some of the basic hypotheses of the Power Theory were supported in this study.en
dc.format.extent21 pagesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.subjectethnic groupsen
dc.subjectPower Theoryen
dc.subjectpolitical behavioren
dc.subjectperceived political threaten
dc.titleEthnic Diversity, Inter-Ethnic Relations, and Mass Political Behavioren
dc.title.alternativeEthnic Diversity, Inter-Ethnic Relations, and Mass Political Behavioren
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentPolitical Scienceen
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity Undergraduate Fellowen
thesis.degree.levelUndergraduateen
dc.type.materialtexten


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record