NOTE: Restrictions are in place to limit access to one or more of the files associated with this item. Authorized users must log in to gain access. Non-authorized users do not have access to these files.
Visit the Energy Systems Laboratory Homepage.
dc.creator | Rusnak, J. J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-04-11T15:35:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-04-11T15:35:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1981 | |
dc.identifier.other | ESL-IE-81-04-126 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/94388 | |
dc.description.abstract | Meters don't save energy' This statement has often concluded a meeting or terminated a budget request leaving the metering proponent feeling frustrated. Such a statement is technically correct when meters are evaluated in the same way as equipment that provides direct and measureable savings. It does little, however, for the engineer or manager who feels shackled by the lack of data to control his energy conservation program. This paper investigates a number of ways that meters are used to provide energy savings. Some are direct savings that can be quantified; others are indirect savings that result from better management control of energy resources. The foundation for this paper was a series of interviews with energy managers from several large U.S. industrial firms. | en |
dc.publisher | Energy Systems Laboratory (http://esl.tamu.edu) | |
dc.publisher | Texas A&M University (http://www.tamu.edu) | |
dc.subject | Meters | en |
dc.subject | Direct and Indirect Energy Savings | en |
dc.subject | Justification | en |
dc.title | You Can Justify Meters for Your Energy Conservation Program | en |
dc.contributor.sponsor | Engineering Measurements Company |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
IETC - Industrial Energy Technology Conference
Industrial Energy Technology Conference