NOTE: Restrictions are in place to limit access to one or more of the files associated with this item. Authorized users must log in to gain access. Non-authorized users do not have access to these files.
Visit the Energy Systems Laboratory Homepage.
dc.creator | McReynolds, C. J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-11-09T20:15:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-11-09T20:15:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1986-06 | |
dc.identifier.other | ESL-IE-86-06-41 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/93011 | |
dc.description.abstract | Today's emphasis is on saving dollars -- not just Btu's. Ford spent $900 million on energy in 150 plants worldwide last year. In 1972, Ford's energy bill was $238 million. Last year's bill would have been 35% higher than $900 million, if it had not been for conservation since 1972. First steps were cutting out obvious waste; e.g., repairing steam and compressed-air leaks, shutting down equipment promptly at end-of-shift, and lowering building temperatures -- simple measures that cost little but saved 25% of energy. Other steps included boiler tune-ups, improved combustion controls, weekend and summer boiler shutdown, steam trap surveys, automatic motor shutoff timers, fast-acting fabric traffic doors, and area metering. Steps requiring greater investment included energy management systems, waste incinerators with heat recovery, cogeneration and variable-frequency drives. Much pioneering work was done on self-help gas, negotiating reduced utility rates and rate case interventions. Employee awareness and involvement are essential. Regular energy council meetings and an attractive energy newsletter also help. | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Energy Systems Laboratory (http://esl.tamu.edu) | |
dc.subject | Cost Savings | en |
dc.subject | Energy Efficiency Program | en |
dc.title | Saving Energy at Ford | en |
dc.type | Presentation | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
IETC - Industrial Energy Technology Conference
Industrial Energy Technology Conference