NOTE: Restrictions are in place to limit access to one or more of the files associated with this item. Authorized users must log in to gain access. Non-authorized users do not have access to these files.
Visit the Energy Systems Laboratory Homepage.
dc.creator | Brown, M. | |
dc.creator | Moore, D. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-08-24T17:16:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-24T17:16:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1990-06 | |
dc.identifier.other | ESL-IE-90-06-28 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/92280 | |
dc.description.abstract | Cooling in industrial facilities has traditionally been performed by mechanical vapor compression units. While it remains the standard, recent concerns with the rising cost of electricity and environmental legislation restricting or outlawing CFC refrigerants has caused many plants to evaluate existing cooling methods. This paper presents case studies on alternate cooling methods used for space conditioning at several different industrial facilities. Methods discussed include direct and indirect evaporative, desiccant, and absorption cooling. Cooling effectiveness, operating cost and investment are also presented. Data for this evaluation was collected from clients served by Georgia Tech's Industrial Energy Extension Service, a state-sponsored energy conservation assistance program. | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Energy Systems Laboratory (http://esl.eslwin.tamu.edu) | |
dc.subject | Space Conditioning | en |
dc.subject | Alternative Cooling Methods | en |
dc.title | Alternate Cooling Methods for Industrial Plants | en |
dc.type | Presentation | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
IETC - Industrial Energy Technology Conference
Industrial Energy Technology Conference