NOTE: Restrictions are in place to limit access to one or more of the files associated with this item. Authorized users must log in to gain access. Non-authorized users do not have access to these files.
Visit the Energy Systems Laboratory Homepage.
dc.creator | Steinmeyer, D. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-08-16T16:16:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-16T16:16:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1991-06 | |
dc.identifier.other | ESL-IE-91-06-04 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/92219 | |
dc.description.abstract | Most processing is thermal. Reaction systems and separation systems are typically dominated by their associated heat exchange. Optimization of this heat exchange has a tremendous leverage on the ultimate process efficiency. Heat exchangers use energy two ways: as frictional drop and as the loss in ability to do work when heat is degraded. The selection of design numbers for ∆P and ∆T is frequently the most important decision the process makes, but often this goes unrecognized. | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Energy Systems Laboratory (http://esl.eslwin.tamu.edu) | |
dc.subject | Heat Exchange Optimization | en |
dc.subject | Temperature Difference | en |
dc.subject | Pressure Drop | en |
dc.title | Optimum Temperature Difference and Pressure Drop in Heat Exchangers | en |
dc.type | Presentation | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
IETC - Industrial Energy Technology Conference
Industrial Energy Technology Conference