Visit the Energy Systems Laboratory Homepage.
dc.creator | Christman, K. D. | |
dc.creator | Haberl, J. S. | |
dc.creator | Claridge, D. E. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-08T17:21:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-06-08T17:21:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-11 | |
dc.identifier.other | ESL-IC-09-11-31 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/90860 | |
dc.description.abstract | This analysis was conducted to identify the energy cost savings from retrofitting Texas buildings with air-to-air ERV (Energy Recovery Ventilator) systems. This analysis applied ERV and psychrometric equations in a bin-type procedure to determine the energy and costs required to condition outside air to return-air conditions. This analysis does not consider interactions with the air-handling system; therefore the effects of economizers, reheat schemes, variable flow rates and other adaptive components were not considered. This analysis demonstrates that ERV cost-effectiveness is largely dependent upon the building location in Texas (i.e., climate conditions) and outside air fraction: • For a typical laboratory building that requires 100% outside air, an ERV could save roughly $1.00 to $1.50 per cubic foot per minute (CFM) of outside air during a one year period. • For a typical office building that only requires 10% outside air, an ERV could save up to $1.00 per CFM of outside air over the period of one year. | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Energy Systems Laboratory (http://esl.tamu.edu) | |
dc.subject | Air-to-Air Energy Recovery Ventilators (ERV) | en |
dc.subject | Texas Buildings | en |
dc.title | Analysis of Energy Recovery Ventilator Savings for Texas Buildings | en |
dc.type | Presentation | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
ICEBO - International Conference for Enhanced Building Operations
International Conference for Enhanced Building Operations