Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCheibub, José Antonio
dc.contributor.advisorWhitten, Guy D
dc.creatorDe Miranda Queiroz Moreira, Thiago
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-12T15:11:39Z
dc.date.available2023-10-12T15:11:39Z
dc.date.created2023-08
dc.date.issued2023-08-04
dc.date.submittedAugust 2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/200114
dc.description.abstractTheoretically, this research addresses questions concerning political representation in democracies. I investigate how elements that make the electoral environment up impact candidates’ strategies, voting choices, and electoral reforms. In the first chapter, I test hypotheses about incumbency advantage in preferential proportional representation (PR) elections. According to conventional wisdom in the literature, competitive and personalized campaigns would undermine any possible electoral advantage of incumbents in these electoral systems. I show that, even under these adverse conditions, incumbents can still obtain an electoral advantage. But in PR elections, they adopt strategies that aim to expand political support to other localities in the district. Also, my findings show that incumbents influence party decisions to favor their candidacies. These results suggest that the literature underestimates the relevance of parties and incumbents in PR systems with preferential votes. The second essay focuses on voting behavior in the context of polarizing politics. I show that polarization reduces the willingness—particularly among supporters of the incumbent party—to sanction the party in government for poor economic conditions. My results show that polarization weakens electoral accountability. Even abstention becomes a weaker mechanism of economic voting when politics gets more polarized. In the third chapter, I study why elected officials pass electoral reforms that, at first glance, could undermine their prospects in future elections. Analyzing why representatives with rural electoral bases supported the official ballot reform, I show that strategies to make voters—translate support into votes— are crucial in understanding electoral reforms. Before the official ballot, candidates had to print and distribute ballots to potential voters. The combination of suffrage extension and electoral competition increased the costs of making voters. As a result, many representatives saw the official ballot as an opportunity to outsource these costs. Jointly, these essays stress my specialization in political representation, showing my interest in understanding how contextual factors drive mass and elite behavior.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectIncumbency Advantage
dc.subjectProportional Representation
dc.subjectPolarization
dc.subjectEconomic Voting
dc.subjectElectoral Reform
dc.titleElectoral Context and Political Choices: Essays on Mass and Elite Behavior
dc.typeThesis
thesis.degree.departmentPolitical Science
thesis.degree.disciplinePolitical Science
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M University
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCooperman, Alicia D
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCompton, Mallory E
dc.type.materialtext
dc.date.updated2023-10-12T15:11:39Z
local.etdauthor.orcid0000-0002-3891-572X


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record