Public Pension Reforms and Fiscal Foresight: Narrative Evidence and Aggregate Implications
Abstract
With aging societies, policymakers have increasingly focused on pension retrenchment reforms in recent years to keep their pension systems solvent. PERC Professor Sarah Zubairy and co-author Huixin Bi explore the evolution of pension policy across countries and investigate the macroeconomic impact of pension structural reforms in OECD countries from 1962 to 2017, in particular those with implementation delays. The new data set uncovers that changes in pension policy come in waves, with a rapid expansion of pension systems between 1960s and 1980s followed by a wave of retrenchments since 1990s. Structural pension reforms, which are motivated by long-run fiscal sustainability concerns, often come with significant implementation delays. Findings show that in response to structural pension retrenchments without delays, people close to retirement stay in the work force longer to compensate for the decline in their pensions, leading to a decline in old-age pension spending. News about structural pension retrenchment in the future, however, lead the marginal group of population to exit the labor market prior to the reform being implemented. As a result, government spending on old age pensions tend to increase, rather than decrease, over the medium term. This channel of fiscal foresight is particularly prevalent for pension reforms that change retirement age and contribution years and that come with longer implementation delays.
Description
PublicFinanceCollections
Citation
Zubairy, Sarah; Bi, Huixi (2020). Public Pension Reforms and Fiscal Foresight: Narrative Evidence and Aggregate Implications. Private Enterprise Research Center, Texas A&M University; Texas A&M University. Library. Available electronically from https : / /hdl .handle .net /1969 .1 /199411.