Show simple item record

dc.creatorVan Huyck, John
dc.creatorWade, Chad
dc.date2014
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-02T15:52:23Z
dc.date.available2023-10-02T15:52:23Z
dc.date.issued2014-04-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/199396
dc.descriptionPublicFinance
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents experimental evidence suggesting that persistent price dispersion that violates the law of one price may be a disequilibrium phenomena. Increasing market concentration increases the pecuniary incentive to give a best response andsatisfy the law of one price, that is, a few large firms have a larger pecuniary incentive to solve the allocation coordination problem than many small firms. In the two firm treatment, the law of one price holds. However, in both treatments with small firms or transportation costs we observe persistent price dispersion. The paper also finds evidence of ineficient cross-hauling for purely strategic reasons.en
dc.format.mediumElectronicen
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherPrivate Enterprise Research Center, Texas A&M University
dc.relationPublicFinanceen
dc.relation.ispartof1402
dc.rightsNO COPYRIGHT - UNITED STATESen
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/NoC-US/1.0/?language=en
dc.subject1402en
dc.subjectMarket concentrationen
dc.subjectOptimization premiumen
dc.subjectStrategic suppliersen
dc.subjectCross-haulingen
dc.subjectPriceen
dc.titleMarket Concentration, Price Dispersion and Inefficient Cross-hauling in the Laboratoryen
dc.typeWorkingPapersen
dc.type.materialTexten
dc.type.materialStillImageen
dc.format.digitalOriginborn digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Library


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record