Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWhitten, Guy D.
dc.contributor.advisorTeodoro, Manuel P
dc.creatorBondarenko, Lauren Aubrey
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-07T16:16:41Z
dc.date.available2024-05-01T06:05:24Z
dc.date.created2022-05
dc.date.issued2022-04-19
dc.date.submittedMay 2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/197297
dc.description.abstractFrom 1970 to 2019, approximately 71% of all terrorist attacks were classified as either a bombing or an armed assault. This pattern suggests that other tactical choices are made with less frequency and may need specific explanations. How are tactical decisions made within terrorist organizations? And what factors influence those decisions? While there is a robust political science literature on the causes and consequences of terrorism writ large, relatively little is known about how terrorist organizations approach decision-making across their tactical repertoires. In this dissertation, I will explore several potential factors that could influence how tactical decisions are made by terrorist organizations. First, I argue that terrorist organizations use specific tactics and expand the number of tactics employed in response to increasing uncertainty in the external operating environment, specifically in response to a state’s use of repressive actions. I argue that, where possible, terrorist organizations will match the state’s repression actions in subsequent at-tacks. Further, when a matching technique is no longer available, a terrorist organization will have no choice but to increase the number of tactical types it employs in an attempt to make its actions less predictable for the state. In the next two chapters, I approach the question of tactical decision-making from an organizational perspective, drawing upon literature on isomorphic pressures that organizations face. In the second empirical chapter, I develop an argument for terrorist professionalization based on the relationships between parent, affiliate, and allied organizations. The final empirical chapter pivots the focus to the relationship between parent, splinter, and rival organizations. Specifically, I argue that the existence of splinter and rival organizations are evidence of radical movements inside the profession, which tests the jurisdictional bounds of the profession. Developing and testing theories such as those suggested in this dissertation will bring the research community closer to capturing the reality of terrorist activities.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectterrorist
dc.subjectterrorism
dc.subjectterrorist organization
dc.subjecttactics
dc.subjectprofessionalization
dc.subjectprofessionalism
dc.subjectisomorphism
dc.subjectrepression
dc.subjectdecision-making
dc.titleTactical Decision Making in Terrorist Organizations
dc.typeThesis
thesis.degree.departmentPolitical Science
thesis.degree.disciplinePolitical Science
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M University
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKoch, Michael T
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCrisman-Cox, Casey
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHuang, Reyko
dc.type.materialtext
dc.date.updated2023-02-07T16:16:42Z
local.embargo.terms2024-05-01
local.etdauthor.orcid0000-0002-4286-2456


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record