Show simple item record

dc.contributor.otherStone & Webster Engineering Corportation
dc.creatorEidson, Mark
dc.creatorMahalingam, Sankar
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T14:25:11Z
dc.date.available2021-06-17T14:25:11Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/193891
dc.descriptionPresentationen
dc.description.abstractDuring the past three years Stone & Webster has performed a variety of process hazard analyses (PHAs) on projects for a variety of major clients, each with a different corporate PHA performance requirement. This paper discusses Stone &Webster's experience with preliminary hazard reviews, safety integrity level (SIL) analyses, facility siting reviews, health safety & environmental reviews, HAZOPs and vendor equipment HAZOPs during the life of a project. The paper then evaluates the successes and failures during the application of each of these methods and the respective advantages and disadvantages for both owners and engineering contractors. Finally, the paper presents Stone & Webster's current strategy for identifying health and safety concerns based upon these experiences.en
dc.format.extent8 pagesen
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherMary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center
dc.relation.ispartofMary K O'Connor Process Safety Symposium. Proceedings 2000.en
dc.rightsIN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTEDen
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/
dc.subjectGrassroots projectsen
dc.titleProcess Hazard Analysis Strategies for the Life Cycle of a Grassroots Projecten
dc.type.genrepapersen
dc.format.digitalOriginborn digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas &M University. Libraries


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record