Show simple item record

dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health,Texas A&M Ergonomics Center
dc.creatorMehta, Ranjana K.
dc.creatorPeres, S. Camille
dc.creatorHoyle, William
dc.creatorShortz, Ashley
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-11T21:24:21Z
dc.date.available2021-06-11T21:24:21Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/193556
dc.descriptionPresentationen
dc.description.abstractIncident reviews of oil spill events (both large and small) suggest that human error, or more appropriately “systems error”, is a contributor to 50% of well control incidents (primarily kicks). The purpose of this study was to examine operator situation awareness (SA) and associated physiological load, using heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV), during simulated offshore well control scenarios that differed in their complexity and criticality levels. Ten trained participants completed four scenarios (simple non-failure, simple failure, complex non-failure, and complex-failure) in an experimental session, lasting ~6 hours. Measures were obtained for each scenario, including speed and accuracy of the task performance, composite scores obtained from the Situational Awareness Rating Technique (SART), and operator heart rate and HRV measures. Greater errors were found in kick-related failure events, and complex scenarios were associated with longer reaction times. Participants perceived lower SA levels during complex scenarios, and a trend was observed for lowest SA during complex failure scenarios. Finally, physiological responses did not differ for any of the four scenarios, however, a trend of increasing physiological ‘load” was observed with more complex and critical scenarios. High variability in participant covert and overt responses may increase the challenges associated with classifying high-risk well control scenarios. It is critical that scenario planners understand and recognize the variability in driller situation awareness and associated physiological load such scenario planners can then begin to start planning for alternative future scenarios.en
dc.format.extent2 pagesen
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherMary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center
dc.relation.ispartofMary K O'Connor Process Safety Symposium. Proceedings 2017.en
dc.rightsIN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTEDen
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/
dc.subjectSituational Awarenessen
dc.titleRelationship between operator situation awareness and physiological states during complex and critical offshore well control scenariosen
dc.type.genrePapersen
dc.format.digitalOriginborn digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas &M University. Libraries


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record