Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDavis, Trina J
dc.contributor.advisorVàsquez Neshyba, Monica
dc.creatorWhitaker, Adam Christopher
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-03T22:04:31Z
dc.date.available2022-08-01T06:54:20Z
dc.date.created2020-08
dc.date.issued2020-05-13
dc.date.submittedAugust 2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/192368
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this qualitative dominant crossover mixed action research study was to understand eighth grade English I students’ middle school reading and writing preferences, writing experiences, the impact of culturally relevant writing instruction, and the impact, if any, it had on increasing students’ writing self-efficacy. A qualitative dominant crossover mixed approached was selected for this study as it involved collecting both qualitative and quantitative data. The qualitative data included: reflective journals, a writing interest form, learning logs, and writing artifacts collected throughout the writing unit. The quantitative data consisted of students rating their writing self-efficacy at the beginning and at the end of the writing unit and rating students’ expository and narrative writing, using a STAAR rubric, at the beginning and end of the research study. The participants in this study consisted of 63 students who were enrolled in an eighth grade English I course at the research site and participated in the three-week writing unit. An in-depth In Vivo data analysis and descriptive statistics were utilized to correlate the quantitative data with qualitative data. The In Vivo data analysis revealed four themes: (1) the lack of culturally relevant writing instruction, (2) culturally relevant writing instruction has the potential to ignite student interest and writing passion, (3) culturally relevant writing instruction challenges students to explore their cultural background and the background of others, and (4) the lack of time impeded students ability to create writing products. The descriptive statistics indicated a statistical difference for student writing self-efficacy for poetic, narrative, and expository writing. Students’ self-efficacy scores increased for narrative and expository writing but decreased for poetic writingen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectculturally relevant writing instructionen
dc.subjectself-efficacyen
dc.titleExploring Eighth Grade Middle School Students’ Reading and Writing Experiences and the Impact of Culturally Relevant Writing Instructionen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentTeaching, Learning, and Cultureen
thesis.degree.disciplineCurriculum and Instructionen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Educationen
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWebb-Hasan, Gwendolyn
dc.contributor.committeeMemberViruru, Radhika
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.date.updated2021-02-03T22:04:32Z
local.embargo.terms2022-08-01
local.etdauthor.orcid0000-0001-8205-5408


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record