Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSridhar, Shrihari
dc.contributor.advisorMittal, Vikas
dc.creatorChen, Yixing
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-17T14:13:49Z
dc.date.available2022-05-01T07:12:21Z
dc.date.created2020-05
dc.date.issued2020-03-25
dc.date.submittedMay 2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/191593
dc.description.abstractThere is a rich tradition in the marketing literature that develops models to help executives quantify the financial return on marketing-mix investment. My dissertation adds novel insights to this literature by examining the social return of marketing investment in economically large and societally important sectors that are under-researched in marketing: Education and Healthcare. Essay 1 provides a comprehensive examination of benefits and costs of school district internet access spending (SDIAS). Compiling a dataset on SDIAS, school performance, and household internet access, I find that while a $1-million increase in SDIAS is associated with an improvement of academic performance indicators by .2 to 3 percentage points (amounting to $1.2 million to $2.5 million for a school district), it is also associated with a 7% increase in Part II offense-related disciplinary problems (amounting to a $38,700 to $80,160 annual cost for a school district). I also find that the benefits and costs of SDIAS are more pronounced in schools in regions with a higher level of household internet access, highlighting the need for school districts to tailor their supplementary initiatives by the level of pre-existing internet exposure in the neighborhoods. Essay 2 examines the causal effect of outreach interventions on cancer screening completion, uncovers patient-level treatment effect heterogeneity, and assesses the return on these outreach interventions. Using a unique multi-period randomized field experiment among 1,800 at-risk patients for liver cancer, I find that: 1) compared to the usual-care condition, outreach alone (outreach with patient navigation) increases screening completion rates by 10-20 (13-24) percentage points, and 2) patient-level treatment effects vary substantially across periods and by patients’ demographics, health status, visit history, health system accessibility, and neighborhood socioeconomic status, thereby facilitating the implementation of the targeted outreach program. The simulation shows that the targeted outreach program improves the return on the randomized outreach program by 74%-96% (or $1.6 million to $2 million).en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectReturn on marketing investmenten
dc.subjectSocial impact of marketing interventionsen
dc.subjectSocial-sector organizationsen
dc.subjectEducation and healthcareen
dc.titleReturn on Marketing Investment: New Perspectives from Education and Healthcareen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentMarketingen
thesis.degree.disciplineBusiness Administrationen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSorescu, Alina
dc.contributor.committeeMemberAn, Yonghong
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.date.updated2020-12-17T14:13:50Z
local.embargo.terms2022-05-01
local.etdauthor.orcid0000-0001-5509-4161


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record