Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorArhur Jr., Winfred
dc.creatorLai, Chih-Ching
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-10T16:20:53Z
dc.date.available2021-12-01T08:44:16Z
dc.date.created2019-12
dc.date.issued2019-11-18
dc.date.submittedDecember 2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/189086
dc.description.abstractThe current personnel selection literature utilizes a combination of predictor constructs and predictor methods to predict applicants’ future job performance, known as the traditional selection approach. Another approach is the true probationary model where all applicants are hired for an extended period of time, and the employer makes a selection decision for a full-time position based on their performance. Both selection approaches have their advantages and disadvantages but using internships for selection purposes can effectively mitigate their respective drawbacks and capitalize on their advantages. If designed properly, internships can potentially be more effective and viable than either the traditional or the true probationary selection systems. Practical and theoretical implications are discussed.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectInternshipsen
dc.subjectTraditional Selectionen
dc.subjectPersonnel selectionen
dc.titleThe Use of Internships for Selection Purposes: The “Midpoint” Between the Traditional Selection Approach and the True Probationary Modelen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentPsychological and Brain Sciencesen
thesis.degree.disciplineIndustrial/Organizational Psychologyen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberAtoba, Olabisi
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBoswell, Wendy
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.date.updated2020-09-10T16:20:54Z
local.embargo.terms2021-12-01
local.etdauthor.orcid0000-0002-0498-900X


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record