Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMa, Xingmao
dc.contributor.advisorBurnett, David B
dc.creatorHussey, Tyler Franklin
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-18T22:01:42Z
dc.date.available2019-05-01T06:09:34Z
dc.date.created2017-05
dc.date.issued2017-04-28
dc.date.submittedMay 2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/174772
dc.description.abstractAccumulating seismicity and groundwater contamination concerns are fueling increased regulations that can significantly burden an exploration and production (E&P) company’s water management budget – especially in a low-cost market. The goal of this research is to evaluate the economics of oil and gas produced water (PW) treatment and reuse as an alternative to injection well disposal. The primary objectives are: 1) determine general field conditions that economically favor treatment and reuse, 2) compare the relative economics between mobile (on-site) and centralized treatment, 3) evaluate pipeline versus trucking transportation and 4) assess zero liquid discharge (ZLD) treatment technology feasibility. The model, built to address the objectives, functions as a PW management planning and decision support tool for an operator. For input field conditions, the model simulates disposal and treatment and reuse – comparing mobile versus centralized treatment. Trucking and pipeline conveyance are evaluated for centralized treatment transportation. The model outputs the net water management cost and operator breakeven treatment cost (OBE) for each scenario. The OBE is the cost of treatment for which the economics of injection disposal and treatment and reuse are equal. When a service company’s treatment cost is less than or equal to the OBE, treatment and reuse is feasible. A sensitivity analysis identified the primary economic drivers. The observed effects of each driver on the OBE indicate conditions that promote treatment and reuse. These conditions include long distances, high treatment recoveries, high injection costs and long project lifespans. Relative economics favor on-site treatment and reuse for long distances, high treatment recoveries, low project lifespans and an increase in pipeline cost. The opposite is observed for centralized with pipeline. The model simulated for the Texas Permian Basin. Results demonstrate the use of the model and provide insights into the potential for Permian Basin water cost savings.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectProduced wateren
dc.subjecttreatment and reuseen
dc.subjectOil and gasen
dc.subjectWater treatmenten
dc.subjectUpstream wateren
dc.titleBridging the Gap between Produced Water and Source Water: An Economic Analysis of Produced Water Treatmenten
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentCivil Engineeringen
thesis.degree.disciplineCivil Engineeringen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A & M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHascakir, Berna
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.date.updated2019-02-18T22:01:43Z
local.embargo.terms2019-05-01
local.etdauthor.orcid0000-0001-8529-8966


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record