dc.contributor.advisor | Kreuter, Urs | |
dc.creator | Clifton, Kyle Leann | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-18T16:55:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-01T06:37:08Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-08-08 | |
dc.date.submitted | August 2018 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/174173 | |
dc.description.abstract | Protected conservation areas are increasingly threatened as the need for land and resources
grows. South Africa has a storied past of wildlife conservation and its protected areas
continue to be popular nature tourism destinations. However, legacies of colonization and
apartheid polices remain. There is an imbalance in power, resource ownership, and
protected area access between white and black South Africans, particularly within private
natures reserves (PNRs). The history of conflict in these areas is exacerbated by the
militarized response to rhino poaching over the last decade. To help ameliorate this
conflict, communities surrounding nature reserves should receive benefits from
conservation to partially address environmental injustices. Still, PNR capacity to
sufficiently and appropriately address benefit needs is a challenge. Stakeholders need to
better understand how to effectively share benefits with appropriate consideration of both
community and conservation groups.
This dissertation addresses this need by exploring conflict and benefit sharing between
PNRs and nearby communities in the Kruger to Canyons (K2C) Biosphere, South Africa.
We present a review of: 1) relevant literature and the dissertation work; 2) PNR
stakeholders’ motivations and deterrents to engage in benefit sharing; 3) how benefit
sharing influences community members’ perceptions of development outcomes,
conservation sentiment, and conflict with reserves; and 4) recommendations on the most
effective benefit sharing strategy design and administration. To achieve this, two
complementary surveys were administered to stakeholders from five PNRs and three
communities in the K2C. Simple descriptive analyses were used to determine community
and PNR stakeholder perceptions, and associations between stakeholder groups were
explored to determine similarities and differences.
After income through employment, a benefit sharing strategy that provides diffuse benefits
and has a limited focus was found to be most effective to promote development
satisfaction and positive perceptions of the reserve within communities. To support this
strategy, PNRs should work to centralize the administration of benefit sharing within and
across reserves. Centralization will allow for improved access to resources, and the
coordination of benefit programs to maximize efficiency and impact. New and
strengthened collaboration networks developed in the response to rhino poaching can be
leveraged to improve benefit sharing administration. | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.subject | Benefit sharing | en |
dc.subject | Development | en |
dc.subject | Conservation | en |
dc.subject | South Africa | en |
dc.subject | Communities | en |
dc.subject | Protected areas | en |
dc.title | The Impact of Constituency Building on Development and Conservation Sentiment in the Kruger to Canyons Biosphere | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.department | Ecosystem Science and Management | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | Ecosystem Science and Management | en |
thesis.degree.grantor | Texas A & M University | en |
thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
thesis.degree.level | Doctoral | en |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Twine, Wayne | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Matarrita-Cascante, David | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Smeins, Fred | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Stronza, Amanda | |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.date.updated | 2019-01-18T16:55:56Z | |
local.embargo.terms | 2020-08-01 | |
local.etdauthor.orcid | 0000-0002-2766-5198 | |