Show simple item record

dc.creatorTaylor, Lori L.
dc.creatorDar, Jawad
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-05T23:50:37Z
dc.date.available2015-02-05T23:50:37Z
dc.date.issued2014-12
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/153685
dc.description.abstractSince the start of Lyndon B. Johnson’s War on Poverty, the federal government has spent vast sums of money trying to lower U.S. poverty rates. Yet, despite the repeated allocation of massive financial resources, overall poverty rates have barely budged. There are two particularly pervasive possible explanations for that lack of success. First, official measures of poverty are geographically biased and financially incomplete. Second, federal policy relies heavily on those biased and incomplete measures to allocate aid. Despite the difficulties, adjusting the federal poverty thresholds used to determine eligibility for anti-poverty programs is the right thing to do. If the U.S. is going to win the War on Poverty, it needs a new map.en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMosbacher Institute for Trade, Economics & Public Policy
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 5;Issue 6
dc.subjectpovertyen
dc.subjectFPLen
dc.subjectcost-of-livingen
dc.titleThe War on Poverty Needs a New Mapen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.sponsorBush School of Government and Public Service


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • The Takeaway
    Policy Briefs from the Mosbacher Institute for Trade, Economics, and Public Policy

Show simple item record