Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorZhu, Ding
dc.creatorBriggs, Kathryn
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-09T20:48:04Z
dc.date.available2015-01-09T20:48:04Z
dc.date.created2014-05
dc.date.issued2014-05-05
dc.date.submittedMay 2014
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/152755
dc.description.abstractHydraulic fracturing is the primary stimulation method within low permeability reservoirs, in particular shale reservoirs. Hydraulic fracturing provides a means for making shale reservoirs commercially viable by inducing and propping fracture networks allowing gas flow to the wellbore. Without a propping agent, the created fracture channels would close due to the in-situ stress and defeat the purpose of creating induced fractures. The fracture network conductivity is directly related to the well productivity; therefore, the oil and gas industry is currently trying to better understand what impacts fracture conductivity. Shale is a broad term for a fine-grained, detrital rock, composed of silts and clays, which often suggest laminar, fissile structure. This work investigates the difference between two vertical zones in the Fayetteville shale, the FL2 and FL3, by measuring laboratory fracture conductivity along an artificially induced, rough, aligned fracture. Unpropped and low concentration 30/70 mesh proppant experiments were run on samples from both zones. Parameters that were controllable, such as proppant size, concentration and type, were kept consistent between the two zones. In addition to comparing experimental fracture conductivity results, mineral composition, thin sections, and surface roughness scans were evaluated to distinguish differences between the two zones rock properties. To further identify differences between the two zones, 90-day production data was analyzed. The FL2 consistently recorded higher conductivity values than the FL3 at closure stress up to 3,000 psi. The mineral composition analysis of the FL2 and FL3 samples concluded that although the zones had similar clay content, the FL2 contained more quartz and the FL3 contained more carbonate. Additionally, the FL2 samples were less fissile and had larger surface fragments created along the fracture surface; whereas the FL3 samples had flaky, brittle surface fragments. The FL2 had higher conductivity values at closure stresses up to 3,000 psi due to the rearrangement of bulky surface fragments and larger void spaces created when fragments were removed from the fracture surface. The conductivity difference between the zones decreases by 25% when low concentration, 0.03 lb/ft^(2), 30/70 mesh proppant is placed evenly on the fracture surface. The conductivity difference decrease is less drastic, changing only 7%, when increase the proppant concentration to 0.1 lb/ft^(2) 30/70 mesh proppant. In conclusion, size and brittleness of surface fracture particles significantly impacts the unpropped and low concentration fracture conductivity.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjecthydraulic fracture conductivityen
dc.subjectFayetteville Shaleen
dc.subjectproppanten
dc.subjectinduced natural fracturesen
dc.titleThe Influence of Vertical Location on Hydraulic Fracture Conductivity in the Fayetteville Shaleen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentPetroleum Engineeringen
thesis.degree.disciplinePetroleum Engineeringen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A & M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHill, A. D.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberPope, Michael
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.date.updated2015-01-09T20:48:04Z
local.etdauthor.orcid0000-0002-0454-2101


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record