Visit the Energy Systems Laboratory Homepage.
dc.creator | Mukhopadhyay, J. | |
dc.creator | Baltazar, J. C. | |
dc.creator | Haberl, J. S. | |
dc.creator | Yazdani, B. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-07-19T21:10:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-07-19T21:10:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.other | ESL-TR-13-09-02 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/152123 | |
dc.description.abstract | This report compares the performance of a 2009 IECC compliant house using IC3 (Ver. 3.12.1), REM/Rate (Ver. 13.00), REScheck (Ver. 4.4.3.1) and EnergyGauge (Ver. 2.8.05). The analysis was conducted for Houston, Dallas and Amarillo - the three cities which represent Climate Zone 2, Climate Zone 3 and Climate Zone 4 in Texas. | en |
dc.publisher | Energy Systems Laboratory (http://esl.tamu.edu) | |
dc.publisher | Texas A&M University (http://www.tamu.edu) | |
dc.title | Comparison of the Performance Redictions of a 2009 IECC Code-Compliant House Using IC3 (Ver.3.12.1), REM/Rate (Ver.13.00), EnergyGauge (Ver. 2.8.05) and ResCHECK (Ver. 4.4.3.1) | en |
dc.contributor.sponsor | Energy Systems Laboratory |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Technical Reports
Technical Reports from the Energy Systems Laboratory