Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHill, A Daniel
dc.creatorAwoleke, Obadare O
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-02T21:28:14Z
dc.date.available2015-05-01T05:57:08Z
dc.date.created2013-05
dc.date.issued2013-01-31
dc.date.submittedMay 2013
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/149287
dc.description.abstractThis work is about fracture conductivity; how to measure and model it based on experimental data. It is also about how to determine the relative importance of the factors that affect its magnitude and how to predict its magnitude based on these factors. We dynamically placed the slurry hereby simulating the slurry placement procedure in a field-scale fracture. We also used factorial and fractional factorial designs as the basis of our experimental investigation. The analysis and interpretation of experimental results take into account the stochastic nature of the process. We found that the relative importance of the investigated factors is dependent on the presence of outliers and how they are handled. Based on our investigation we concluded that the investigated factors arranged in order of decreasing impact on conductivity are: closure stress, polymer loading, flow back rate, presence of breaker, temperature and proppant concentration. In particular, we find that at high temperatures, fracture conductivity was severely reduced due to the formation of a dense proppant-polymer cake. Also, dehydration of the residual gel in the fracture at high flow back rates appears to cause severe damage to conductivity at higher temperatures. This represents a new way of thinking about the fracture cleanup process; not only as a displacement process, but also as a displacement and evaporative process. In engineering practice, this implies that aggressive flow back schemes are not necessarily beneficial for conductivity development. Also, we find that at low proppant concentrations, there is the increased likelihood of the formation of channels and high porosity fractures resulting in high fracture conductivities. The uniqueness of this work is a focus on the development of a conductivity model using regression analysis and also the illustration of a procedure that can be used to develop a conductivity model using dimensional analysis. We reviewed both methodologies and applied them to the challenge of modeling fracture conductivity from experimental studies.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectDynamic fracture conductivityen
dc.subjectfracture fluidsen
dc.subjecthydraulic fracturingen
dc.subjectfactorial analysisen
dc.subjectregression analysisen
dc.titleDynamic Fracture Conductivity—An Experimental Investigation Based on Factorial Analysisen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentPetroleum Engineeringen
thesis.degree.disciplinePetroleum Engineeringen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberZhu, Ding
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLane, Robert H
dc.contributor.committeeMemberDing, Yu
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.date.updated2013-10-02T21:28:14Z
local.embargo.terms2015-05-01


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record