| dc.description.abstract | The National Airspace System in its current incarnation is nearing its maximum
capacity. The Free Flight initiative, which would alter the current system by
allowing pilots to select more direct routes to their destinations, has been proposed
as a solution to this problem. However, allowing pilots to fly anywhere, as opposed
to being restricted to planned jetways, greatly complicates the problem of ensuring
separation between aircraft.
In this thesis I propose using cooperative, multi-agent negotiation techniques
in order to efficiently and pseudo-optimally resolve air traffic conflicts. The system
makes use of software agents running in each aircraft that negotiate with one another
to determine a safe and acceptable solution when a potential air traffic conflict is
detected. The agents negotiate using the Monotonic Concession Protocol and communicate
using aircraft to aircraft data links, or possibly the ADS-B signal.
There are many benefits to using such a system to handle the resolution of air
traffic conflicts. Automating CD&R will improve safety by reducing the workloads
of air traffic controllers. Additionally, the robustness of the system is improved as
the decentralization provided by software agents running in each aircraft reduces the
dependence on a single ground based system to coordinate all aircraft movements.
The pilots, passengers, and carriers benefit as well due to the increased efficiency of
the solutions reached by negotiation. | en |
