dc.contributor.advisor | Conrad, Charles | |
dc.creator | Prothro, John Samuel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2004-11-15T19:48:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2004-11-15T19:48:13Z | |
dc.date.created | 2004-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2004-11-15 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/1160 | |
dc.description.abstract | This research examines the story of 11 September 2001 from an organizational communication perspective. Discourse after the event pointed to "communication difficulties" as a scapegoat for the intelligence community's failure. These analyses are misguided. Therefore, I examine our government's answer to communication difficulties--more bureaucracy. The many communication hindrances associated with bureaucracy are discussed as reasons to rethink our government's reaction. Finally, further research and recommendations are discussed. | en |
dc.format.extent | 181287 bytes | en |
dc.format.extent | 134230 bytes | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Texas A&M University | |
dc.subject | Misguided | en |
dc.subject | Reaction | en |
dc.subject | Intelligence | en |
dc.subject | Flow | en |
dc.subject | 11 | en |
dc.subject | September | en |
dc.subject | 2001 | en |
dc.title | The misguided reaction: reconsidering intelligence flow before 11 September 2001 | en |
dc.type | Book | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.department | Communication | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | Speech Communication | en |
thesis.degree.grantor | Texas A&M University | en |
thesis.degree.name | Master of Arts | en |
thesis.degree.level | Masters | en |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Aune, James Arnt | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Olson, James | |
dc.type.genre | Electronic Thesis | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | born digital | en |