Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSamuelson, Charles D.
dc.creatorDiaz, Ismael
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-14T22:20:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-16T16:18:37Z
dc.date.available2014-01-15T07:05:30Z
dc.date.created2011-12
dc.date.issued2012-02-14
dc.date.submittedDecember 2011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2011-12-10607
dc.description.abstractThis project examines the relationship between team identification and collaboration configuration and how they affect attributions to failure. In a sample of 110 participants, we examined reactions to failure. We manipulated perceptions of similarity among participants and a confederate of the study, we also manipulated collaboration configuration. We found that the collaboration configuration manipulation effected attributions; attributions about teammate failure in the collocated condition were more situational than attributions in the distributed condition, which were more dispositional. This finding supports the notion that collaboration configuration is important for understanding reactions to teammate failure.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectVirtual Teamsen
dc.subjectAttributionsen
dc.subjectReactionsen
dc.subjectSocial Identity Theoryen
dc.subjectIdentificationen
dc.titleIndividual Reactions to Failure in Virtual Teamsen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentPsychologyen
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychologyen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBergman, Mindy E.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberChiaburu, Dan S.
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
local.embargo.terms2014-01-15


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record