Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCoverdale, Josie A.
dc.creatorWolford, Ashley
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-14T22:20:21Z
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-16T16:19:00Z
dc.date.available2014-01-15T07:05:31Z
dc.date.created2011-12
dc.date.issued2012-02-14
dc.date.submittedDecember 2011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2011-12-10525
dc.description.abstractEight cecally cannulated Quarter Horse geldings were utilized in a crossover design with two 28 d periods with a 21 d washout period between. Horses were adapted to dietary treatments from d 1 to 19, dry matter intake was determined from d 20 to 24, and cecal fluid was collected on d 28. Horses were paired by age and body weight (BW) and randomly assigned to treatment. Treatments consisted of housing horses individually in stalls or group housed in a dry lot pen. Regardless of treatment, all horses were individually fed a pelleted concentrate at 1% BW (as fed) offered twice daily 12 h apart. All horses had ad libitum access to coastal bermudagrass hay. Hay was offered to stalled horses initially at 2% BW (as fed) then adjusted based on 120% of a previous 3 d average of voluntary intake. A dual marker system was utilized for estimation of voluntary intake in all horses using titanium dioxide (TiO2) as the external marker and acid detergent insoluble ash (ADIA) as the internal marker. Cecal samples were collected 4-h after the morning meal and immediately analyzed for pH. Samples were transported to the USDA/ARS laboratory to enumerate total anaerobic bacteria and lactic acid bacteria, and to determine methane and ammonia activity. Cecal pH was influenced by housing (P = 0.02) with group housed horses having lower cecal pH values when compared to stalled horses (6.52 +/- 0.04 and 6.69 +/- 0.04, respectively). The cecal pH values of this study are similar to other reported values when feeding similar diets (5). Populations of cecal total anaerobic bacteria and lactobacillus were not influenced by housing (P >= 0.21). Treatments did not affect the production of acetate, propionate, or butyrate (P >= 0.15). Additionally, methane and ammonia production were not affected by treatments (P >= 0.17). Forage intake was greater for group housed horses (P = 0.04) than stalled (8.47 +/- 0.89 kg DM/d and 5.17 +/- 0.89 kg DM/d, respectively). In conclusion, confinement housing did not greatly influence the cecal environment of a horse when similar diets were offered.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectHorseen
dc.subjectCecumen
dc.subjectConfinementen
dc.subjectForage Intakeen
dc.titleInfluence of Confinement Housing on the Cecal Environment of the Horseen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentAnimal Scienceen
thesis.degree.disciplineAnimal Scienceen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberAnderson, Robin C.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberPinchak, William E.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWickersham, Tryon A.
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
local.embargo.terms2014-01-15


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record