Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorEden, Lorraineen_US
dc.creatorDai, Lien_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-14T22:19:20Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-16T16:15:44Z
dc.date.available2014-01-15T07:05:28Z
dc.date.created2011-12en_US
dc.date.issued2012-02-14en_US
dc.date.submittedDecember 2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2011-12-10245en_US
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation examines the strategic choices of multinational enterprises (MNEs) in host countries that become engaged in war. By combining the resource-based view and resource management theory, and drawing additional insights from research on real options and foreign strategic exit, I link the costs attributable to war to the strategic responses of the MNE at the subsidiary level in a novel firm-vulnerability framework. In particular, I develop theory regarding whether a subsidiary will exit from a host country, and if so, the timing (early or late) and mode (whole or partial) of exit. I test my hypotheses on a sample of 626 subsidiaries from 386 Japanese MNEs representing 51 industries in 23 countries at war, both interstate and civil, over the period 1988 to 2006. In analyzing the exit likelihood and timing decisions with time-varying covariates, I employ an extended Cox proportional hazard model, which allows for random-effects modeling of predictor variables at the subsidiary, parent MNE, and host country levels. To determine the exit mode of subsidiaries that choose exit over staying, I use binomial logit models. To correct for potential sample selection bias, I replicate my exit mode results with a Heckman probit model. My findings suggest that iv increasing strategic flexibility can counterbalance the potential disadvantages associated with leveraging strategically salient resources in high-risk locations. In examining war as a broad-based perturbation capable of destroying not only institutionalized values, but also the physical infrastructure and human capital of firms, this dissertation empirically demonstrates how political violence influences the strategies of MNEs. Furthermore, my interdisciplinary approach in integrating theoretical lenses from climate change and natural environment sustainability with existing management literatures to examine the effect of war on firms serves to enhance our understanding of individuals and collectives in extreme conditions.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectwaren_US
dc.subjectpolitical violenceen_US
dc.subjectpolitical instabilityen_US
dc.subjectdiscontinuous environmentsen_US
dc.subjectfirm-government/society relationsen_US
dc.subjectforeign direct investmenten_US
dc.subjectmultinational strategyen_US
dc.subjectresource based viewen_US
dc.subjectresource management theoryen_US
dc.subjectreal options theoryen_US
dc.subjectinterdisciplinary researchen_US
dc.subjectforeign exiten_US
dc.subjectemerging economiesen_US
dc.subjectsurvivalen_US
dc.titleCaught in the Crossfire: Strategies of Multinationals in Host Countries at Waren_US
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentManagementen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineManagementen_US
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen_US
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHitt, Michael A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberZardkoohi, Asgharen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLi, Quanen_US
dc.type.genrethesisen_US
dc.type.materialtexten_US
local.embargo.terms2014-01-15en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record