Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRamsey, Shawnen_US
dc.contributor.advisorForrest, David W.en_US
dc.creatorDickison, James Williamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-14T22:18:38Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-16T16:12:25Z
dc.date.available2012-02-14T22:18:38Zen_US
dc.date.available2012-02-16T16:12:25Z
dc.date.created2010-12en_US
dc.date.issued2012-02-14en_US
dc.date.submittedDecember 2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2010-12-8842en_US
dc.description.abstractTwo trials were conducted to quantify the effects of GnRH and prostaglandin in conjunction with a 7-d CIDR on estrus and on pregnancy rate in comparison with a traditional synchronization protocol. In trial 1, ewes (n=12) were randomly allotted to one of three treatments: CIDR (7 d) with administration of GnRH (Cystorelin®, 50μg, im) at CIDR insertion and PGF2α (Lutalyse®, 20 mg, im) on d 6.5 (GnRH1); the GnRH1 protocol with a second injection of GnRH 30 h after CIDR removal (GnRH2); and CIDR (11 d) with administration of PGF2α at CIDR insertion and PMSG (400 iu) at CIDR removal (PMSG). A blood sample was obtained every 2 h for 42 h after CIDR removal for serum LH analysis. On d 8 after CIDR removal, blood samples were obtained at 12 h intervals for 36 h for serum P4 analysis. One ewe in the GnRH1 group did not retain the CIDR device and was excluded from the analysis. Mean LH concentration did not differ (P = 0.48) among groups. Time and time x treatment affected (P < 0.001) mean LH concentration. Mean P4 concentration was not affected (P = 0.26) by time, treatment or their interaction. In trial 2, ewes (n=72) were randomly allotted to one of the three treatments described in trial 1. At CIDR removal, three ewes per treatment were joined with a single ram fitted with a marking harness in each of 8 pens. Ewes were monitored every hour for estrus activity and ultrasounded transabdominally 60 d after CIDR removal for pregnancy. Estrus activity did not differ (P > 0.05) among the groups. Marking frequency was 92 percent, 75 percent, and 88 percent for GnRH1, GnRH2, and PMSG groups, respectively. Mean interval to estrus was shorter (P < 0.05) for the GnRH2 than for the PMSG group and tended to be reduced (P < 0.10) compared with the GnRH1 group. Pregnancy rate differed (P < 0.05) among treatments (79 percent, 58 percent and 38 percent for GnRH1, GnRH2, and PMSG groups, respectively). These results indicate that synchrony of estrus and pregnancy rate to natural service can be increased in response to a CIDR protocol when combined with administration of GnRH rather than PMSG.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectLuteinizing hormoneen_US
dc.subjectsheepen_US
dc.subjectestrus responseen_US
dc.subjecttimed artificial inseminationen_US
dc.subjectprotocolen_US
dc.titleEffects of GnRH and Prostaglandin Combined with a Short Progestin Regimen on the Synchrony of Estrus and Ovulation in Ewes During the Breeding Seasonen_US
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentAnimal Scienceen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineAnimal Scienceen_US
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen_US
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCavinder, Clay A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHolub, Glenn A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBoleman, Chrisen_US
dc.type.genrethesisen_US
dc.type.materialtexten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record