Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMannan, M. Sam
dc.creatorPrem, Katherine
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-14T22:18:12Z
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-16T16:18:58Z
dc.date.available2012-02-14T22:18:12Z
dc.date.available2012-02-16T16:18:58Z
dc.date.created2010-12
dc.date.issued2012-02-14
dc.date.submittedDecember 2010
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2010-12-8678
dc.description.abstractThe occurrence of catastrophic incidents in the process industry leave a marked legacy of resulting in staggering economic and societal losses incurred by the company, the government and the society. The work described herein is a novel approach proposed to help predict and mitigate potential catastrophes from occurring and for understanding the stakes at risk for better risk informed decision making. The methodology includes societal impact as risk measures along with tangible asset damage monetization. Predicting incidents as leading metrics is pivotal to improving plant processes and, for individual and societal safety in the vicinity of the plant (portfolio). From this study it can be concluded that the comprehensive judgments of all the risks and losses should entail the analysis of the overall results of all possible incident scenarios. Value-at-Risk (VaR) is most suitable as an overall measure for many scenarios and for large number of portfolio assets. FN-curves and F$-curves can be correlated and this is very beneficial for understanding the trends of historical incidents in the U.S. chemical process industry. Analyzing historical databases can provide valuable information on the incident occurrences and their consequences as lagging metrics (or lagging indicators) for the mitigation of the portfolio risks. From this study it can be concluded that there is a strong statistical relationship between the different consequence tiers of the safety pyramid and Heinrich‘s safety pyramid is comparable to data mined from the HSEES database. Furthermore, any chemical plant operation is robust only when a strategic balance is struck between optimal plant operations and, maintaining health, safety and sustaining environment. The balance emerges from choosing the best option amidst several conflicting parameters. Strategies for normative decision making should be utilized for making choices under uncertainty. Hence, decision theory is utilized here for laying the framework for choice making of optimum portfolio option among several competing portfolios. For understanding the strategic interactions of the different contributing representative sets that play a key role in determining the most preferred action for optimum production and safety, the concepts of game theory are utilized and framework has been provided as novel application to chemical process industry.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectquantitative risk analysisen
dc.subjectdecision analysisen
dc.subjectleading metrics, lagging metricsen
dc.subjectFN-curvesen
dc.subjectExceedance curvesen
dc.subjectsafety pyramidsen
dc.subjectExpected utility Theory, Game Theoryen
dc.subjectNash Equilibriumen
dc.subjectPareto Optimalityen
dc.titleRisk Measures Constituting Risk Metrics for Decision Making in the Chemical Process Industryen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentChemical Engineeringen
thesis.degree.disciplineChemical Engineeringen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberEl-Halwagi, Mahmoud M.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWortman, Martin A.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHall, Kenneth R.
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record